Ortega-Gutiérrez Silvia, Hawkins E Gregory, Viso Alma, López-Rodríguez María L, Cravatt Benjamin F
The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology and Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Biochemistry. 2004 Jun 29;43(25):8184-90. doi: 10.1021/bi049395f.
The cellular inactivation of the endogenous cannabinoid (endocannabinoid) anandamide (AEA) represents a controversial and intensely investigated subject. This process has been proposed to involve two proteins, a transporter that promotes the cellular uptake of AEA and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), which hydrolyzes AEA to arachidonic acid. However, whereas the role of FAAH in AEA metabolism is well-characterized, the identity of the putative AEA transporter remains enigmatic. Indeed, the indirect pharmacological evidence used to support the existence of an AEA transporter has been suggested also to be compatible with a model in which AEA uptake is driven by simple diffusion coupled to FAAH metabolism. Here, we have directly addressed the contribution of FAAH to AEA uptake by examining this process in neuronal preparations from FAAH(-/-) mice and in the presence of the uptake inhibitor UCM707. The results of these studies reveal that (i) care should be taken to avoid the presence of artifacts when studying the cellular uptake of lipophilic molecules like AEA, (ii) FAAH significantly contributes to AEA uptake, especially with longer incubation times, and (iii) a UCM707-sensitive protein(s) distinct from FAAH also participates in AEA uptake. Interestingly, the FAAH-independent component of AEA transport was significantly reduced by pretreatment of neurons with the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) antagonist SR141716A. Collectively, these results indicate that the protein-dependent uptake of AEA is largely mediated by known constituents of the endocannabinoid system (FAAH and the CB1 receptor), although a partial contribution of an additional UCM707-sensitive protein is also suggested.
内源性大麻素(内源性大麻素)花生四烯乙醇胺(AEA)的细胞失活是一个有争议且深入研究的课题。有人提出这个过程涉及两种蛋白质,一种促进AEA细胞摄取的转运体和脂肪酸酰胺水解酶(FAAH),后者将AEA水解为花生四烯酸。然而,虽然FAAH在AEA代谢中的作用已得到充分表征,但假定的AEA转运体的身份仍然不明。事实上,用于支持AEA转运体存在的间接药理学证据也被认为与一种模型兼容,在该模型中,AEA的摄取是由与FAAH代谢偶联的简单扩散驱动的。在这里,我们通过在FAAH(-/-)小鼠的神经元制剂中以及在摄取抑制剂UCM707存在的情况下检查这个过程,直接探讨了FAAH对AEA摄取的贡献。这些研究结果表明:(i)在研究像AEA这样的亲脂性分子的细胞摄取时应注意避免出现假象;(ii)FAAH对AEA摄取有显著贡献,尤其是在较长孵育时间时;(iii)一种不同于FAAH的对UCM707敏感的蛋白质也参与AEA摄取。有趣的是,用大麻素受体1(CB1)拮抗剂SR141716A预处理神经元后,AEA转运的FAAH非依赖性成分显著降低。总体而言,这些结果表明,AEA的蛋白质依赖性摄取在很大程度上是由内源性大麻素系统的已知成分(FAAH和CB1受体)介导的,尽管也提示了一种额外的对UCM707敏感的蛋白质有部分贡献。