Suppr超能文献

通过传统超声和超声造影鉴别胰腺囊性肿瘤与假性囊肿

Differentiation of cystic pancreatic neoplasms and pseudocysts by conventional and echo-enhanced ultrasound.

作者信息

Rickes Steffen, Wermke Wolfram

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectiology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jul;19(7):761-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03406.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Echo-enhanced sonography is a non-invasive and increasingly used procedure for the differentiation of pancreatic tumors. However, the diagnostic accuracy of this procedure compared to conventional ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic neoplasms from pseudocysts has never been investigated in a prospective study.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with a cystic pancreatic lesion at the conventional ultrasound (mean age 57 years, range 36-82 years) were included in the study. Sonography was performed by an experienced examiner who was unaware of the patients' clinical diagnosis. The exact diagnosis was based on histological evidence from biopsy examination (surgical or transabdominal fine needle biopsy for all cystic neoplasms and five pseudocysts), or a follow-up of at least 18 months (four pseudocysts).

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients, 19 had cystadenomas, three had cystadenocarcinomas, and nine had pseudocysts. Only 27% of the cystadenomas and 67% of the pseudocysts could be correctly classified by conventional ultrasound. Conversely, 95% of the cystadenomas (P = 0.0001) and all pseudocysts were diagnosed correctly by echo-enhanced sonography. The sensitivity of echo-enhanced sonography with respect to diagnosing cystadenoma was 95% and its specificity was 92%. The corresponding values for pseudocysts were both 100%.

CONCLUSION

Echo-enhanced sonography has a high sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic tumors. With this procedure the differentiation of cystadenomas and pseudocysts can be improved. However, histology is the standard of reference.

摘要

背景与目的

超声造影是一种用于鉴别胰腺肿瘤的非侵入性且应用日益广泛的检查方法。然而,与传统超声相比,该方法在鉴别胰腺囊性肿瘤与假性囊肿方面的诊断准确性从未在前瞻性研究中得到探究。

方法

31例经传统超声检查发现胰腺有囊性病变的患者(平均年龄57岁,范围36 - 82岁)纳入本研究。超声检查由一位不了解患者临床诊断的经验丰富的检查者进行。确切诊断基于活检检查(所有囊性肿瘤和5例假性囊肿均采用手术或经腹细针穿刺活检)的组织学证据,或至少18个月的随访(4例假性囊肿)。

结果

31例患者中,19例为囊腺瘤,3例为囊腺癌,9例为假性囊肿。传统超声仅能正确分类27%的囊腺瘤和67%的假性囊肿。相反,超声造影能正确诊断95%的囊腺瘤(P = 0.0001)和所有假性囊肿。超声造影诊断囊腺瘤的敏感性为95%,特异性为92%。假性囊肿的相应值均为100%。

结论

超声造影在胰腺囊性肿瘤的鉴别诊断中具有高敏感性和特异性。通过该检查可改善囊腺瘤和假性囊肿的鉴别。然而,组织学仍是参考标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验