Jia Haiyan, Bagherzadeh Azadeh, Bicknell Roy, Duchen Michael R, Liu Dan, Zachary Ian
Department of Medicine, The Rayne Institute, University College London, 5 University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, UK.
J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 20;279(34):36148-57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401538200. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D binds to VEGF receptors (VEGFR) VEGFR2/KDR and VEGFR3/Flt4, but the signaling mechanisms mediating its biological activities in endothelial cells are poorly understood. Here we investigated the mechanism of action of VEGF-D, and we compared the signaling pathways and biological responses induced by VEGF-D and VEGF-A in endothelial cells. VEGF-D induced KDR and phospholipase C-gamma tyrosine phosphorylation more slowly and less effectively than VEGF-A at early times but had a more sustained effect and was as effective as VEGF-A after 60 min. VEGF-D activated extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 with similar efficacy but slower kinetics compared with VEGF-A, and this effect was blocked by inhibitors of protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. In contrast to VEGF-A, VEGF-D weakly stimulated prostacyclin production and gene expression, had little effect on cell proliferation, and stimulated a smaller and more transient increase in intracellular [Ca(2+)]. VEGF-D induced strong but more transient phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-mediated Akt activation and increased PI3K-dependent endothelial nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation and cell survival more weakly. VEGF-D stimulated chemotaxis via a PI3K/Akt- and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase-dependent pathway, enhanced protein kinase C- and PI3K-dependent endothelial tubulogenesis, and stimulated angiogenesis in a mouse sponge implant model less effectively than VEGF-A. VEGF-D-induced signaling and biological effects were blocked by the KDR inhibitor SU5614. The finding that differential KDR activation by VEGF-A and VEGF-D has distinct consequences for endothelial signaling and function has important implications for understanding how multiple ligands for the same VEGF receptors can generate ligand-specific biological responses.
血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)-D可与VEGF受体(VEGFR)VEGFR2/KDR和VEGFR3/Flt4结合,但介导其在内皮细胞中生物学活性的信号传导机制仍知之甚少。在此,我们研究了VEGF-D的作用机制,并比较了VEGF-D和VEGF-A在内皮细胞中诱导的信号通路和生物学反应。在早期,VEGF-D诱导KDR和磷脂酶C-γ酪氨酸磷酸化的速度比VEGF-A更慢且效率更低,但具有更持久的作用,且在60分钟后与VEGF-A效果相当。与VEGF-A相比,VEGF-D激活细胞外信号调节蛋白激酶1和2的效力相似,但动力学较慢,且这种作用被蛋白激酶C和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶抑制剂所阻断。与VEGF-A不同,VEGF-D对前列环素的产生和基因表达的刺激较弱,对细胞增殖影响很小,并刺激细胞内[Ca(2+)]产生较小且更短暂升高。VEGF-D诱导强烈但更短暂的磷脂酰肌醇3-激酶(PI3K)介导的Akt激活,对PI3K依赖性内皮型一氧化氮合酶磷酸化和细胞存活的增强作用较弱。VEGF-D通过PI3K/Akt和内皮型一氧化氮合酶依赖性途径刺激趋化作用,增强蛋白激酶C和PI3K依赖性内皮细胞管腔形成,且在小鼠海绵植入模型中刺激血管生成的效果不如VEGF-A。VEGF-D诱导的信号传导和生物学效应被KDR抑制剂SU5614阻断。VEGF-A和VEGF-D对KDR的差异性激活对内皮细胞信号传导和功能产生不同后果,这一发现对于理解同一VEGF受体的多种配体如何产生配体特异性生物学反应具有重要意义。