Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, Hills R, Lynch L, Sellwood E, Edwards S, Hardyman W, Raftery J, Crome P, Lendon C, Shaw H, Bentham P
Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lancet. 2004 Jun 26;363(9427):2105-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16499-4.
Cholinesterase inhibitors produce small improvements in cognitive and global assessments in Alzheimer's disease. We aimed to determine whether donepezil produces worthwhile improvements in disability, dependency, behavioural and psychological symptoms, carers' psychological wellbeing, or delay in institutionalisation. If so, which patients benefit, from what dose, and for how long?
565 community-resident patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease entered a 12-week run-in period in which they were randomly allocated donepezil (5 mg/day) or placebo. 486 who completed this period were rerandomised to either donepezil (5 or 10 mg/day) or placebo, with double-blind treatment continuing as long as judged appropriate. Primary endpoints were entry to institutional care and progression of disability, defined by loss of either two of four basic, or six of 11 instrumental, activities on the Bristol activities of daily living scale (BADLS). Outcome assessments were sought for all patients and analysed by logrank and multilevel models.
Cognition averaged 0.8 MMSE (mini-mental state examination) points better (95% CI 0.5-1.2; p<0.0001) and functionality 1.0 BADLS points better (0.5-1.6; p<0.0001) with donepezil over the first 2 years. No significant benefits were seen with donepezil compared with placebo in institutionalisation (42% vs 44% at 3 years; p=0.4) or progression of disability (58% vs 59% at 3 years; p=0.4). The relative risk of entering institutional care in the donepezil group compared with placebo was 0.97 (95% CI 0.72-1.30; p=0.8); the relative risk of progression of disability or entering institutional care was 0.96 (95% CI 0.74-1.24; p=0.7). Similarly, no significant differences were seen between donepezil and placebo in behavioural and psychological symptoms, carer psychopathology, formal care costs, unpaid caregiver time, adverse events or deaths, or between 5 mg and 10 mg donepezil.
Donepezil is not cost effective, with benefits below minimally relevant thresholds. More effective treatments than cholinesterase inhibitors are needed for Alzheimer's disease.
胆碱酯酶抑制剂可使阿尔茨海默病患者的认知和整体评估略有改善。我们旨在确定多奈哌齐是否能在残疾、依赖程度、行为和心理症状、照料者心理健康或延迟入住机构方面产生有价值的改善。如果是这样,哪些患者会受益,受益于何种剂量,以及持续多长时间?
565名社区居住的轻至中度阿尔茨海默病患者进入为期12周的导入期,在此期间他们被随机分配接受多奈哌齐(5毫克/天)或安慰剂治疗。486名完成该阶段的患者被再次随机分配至多奈哌齐(5或10毫克/天)或安慰剂组,双盲治疗持续至认为合适的时间。主要终点为入住机构护理和残疾进展,残疾进展定义为在布里斯托尔日常生活活动量表(BADLS)上四项基本活动中两项丧失,或11项工具性活动中六项丧失。对所有患者进行结局评估,并通过对数秩检验和多水平模型进行分析。
在最初2年中,多奈哌齐治疗组的认知平均比安慰剂组高出0.8分(简易精神状态检查表,MMSE;95%可信区间0.5 - 1.2;p<0.0001),功能平均比安慰剂组高出1.0分(BADLS;0.5 - 1.6;p<0.0001)。与安慰剂相比,多奈哌齐在入住机构护理方面(3年时分别为42%和44%;p = 0.4)或残疾进展方面(3年时分别为58%和59%;p = 0.4)未显示出显著益处。与安慰剂相比,多奈哌齐组入住机构护理的相对风险为0.97(95%可信区间0.72 - 1.30;p = 0.8);残疾进展或入住机构护理的相对风险为0.96(95%可信区间0.74 - 1.24;p = 0.7)。同样,在行为和心理症状、照料者精神病理学、正规护理费用、无薪照料者时间、不良事件或死亡方面,多奈哌齐与安慰剂之间未观察到显著差异,5毫克和10毫克多奈哌齐之间也无显著差异。
多奈哌齐不具有成本效益,其益处低于最低相关阈值。阿尔茨海默病需要比胆碱酯酶抑制剂更有效的治疗方法。