Hölmich Lisbet R, Vejborg Ilse M, Conrad Carsten, Sletting Susanne, Høier-Madsen Mimi, Fryzek Jon P, McLaughlin Joseph K, Kjøller Kim, Wiik Allan, Friis Søren
Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jul;114(1):204-14; discussion 215-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000128821.87939.b5.
Implant rupture is a well-known complication of breast implant surgery that can pass unnoticed by both patient and physician. To date, no prospective study has addressed the possible health implications of silicone breast implant rupture. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether untreated ruptures are associated with changes over time in magnetic resonance imaging findings, serologic markers, or self-reported breast symptoms. A baseline magnetic resonance imaging examination was performed in 1999 on 271 women who were randomly chosen from a larger cohort of women having cosmetic breast implants for a median period of 12 years (range, 3 to 25 years). A follow-up magnetic resonance imaging examination was carried out in 2001, excluding women who underwent explantation in the period between the two magnetic resonance imaging examinations (n = 44). On the basis of these examinations, the authors identified 64 women who had at least one ruptured implant at the first magnetic resonance imaging examination and, for comparison, all women who had intact implants at both examinations (n = 98). Magnetic resonance images from the two examinations were compared and changes in rupture configuration were evaluated. Comparisons were also made for self-reported breast symptoms occurring during the study period and for changes in serum values of antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and cardiolipin antibodies immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M. The majority of the women with implant rupture had no visible magnetic resonance imaging changes of their ruptured implants. For 11 implants (11 percent) in 10 women, the authors observed progression of silicone seepage, either as a conversion from intracapsular into extracapsular rupture (n = 7), as progression of extra-capsular silicone (n = 3), or as increasing herniation of the silicone within the fibrous capsule (n = 1); however, in most cases, these changes were minor. Some changes could be ascribed to trauma, but others seemed spontaneous. There was no increase in levels of autoantibodies during the study period in either study group. Women with untreated implant ruptures reported a significant increase in nonspecific breast changes (odds ratio, 2.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.8) compared with women without ruptures. On the basis of this first study of women with untreated silicone breast implant rupture, the authors conclude that implant rupture is a relatively harmless condition, which only rarely progresses and gives rise to notable symptoms. Even so, because of a small risk of silicone spread, the authors suggest that women with implant ruptures be followed clinically, if not operated on. Because implant ruptures often occur asymptomatically, any woman with silicone implants, regardless of rupture status, should be evaluated at regular intervals.
植入物破裂是隆乳手术中一种众所周知的并发症,患者和医生都可能未注意到。迄今为止,尚无前瞻性研究探讨硅胶乳房植入物破裂可能对健康产生的影响。本研究的目的是评估未经治疗的破裂是否与磁共振成像结果、血清学标志物或自我报告的乳房症状随时间的变化有关。1999年,对271名女性进行了基线磁共振成像检查,这些女性是从一大群接受美容性乳房植入物的女性中随机挑选出来的,植入时间中位数为12年(范围3至25年)。2001年进行了随访磁共振成像检查,排除了在两次磁共振成像检查期间接受取出手术的女性(n = 44)。基于这些检查,作者确定了64名在首次磁共振成像检查时至少有一个植入物破裂的女性,并作为对照,选取了两次检查时植入物均完好的所有女性(n = 98)。比较了两次检查的磁共振图像,并评估了破裂形态的变化。还比较了研究期间自我报告的乳房症状以及抗核抗体、类风湿因子和心磷脂抗体免疫球蛋白G和免疫球蛋白M血清值的变化。大多数植入物破裂的女性其破裂的植入物在磁共振成像上没有明显变化。在10名女性的11个植入物(11%)中,作者观察到硅胶渗漏有进展,表现为从囊内破裂转变为囊外破裂(n = 7)、囊外硅胶进展(n = 3)或硅胶在纤维囊内突出增加(n = 1);然而,在大多数情况下,这些变化较小。有些变化可归因于创伤,但其他变化似乎是自发的。在研究期间,两个研究组的自身抗体水平均未升高。与未破裂的女性相比,未经治疗的植入物破裂的女性报告非特异性乳房变化显著增加(优势比,2.1;95%置信区间,1.2至3.8)。基于对未经治疗的硅胶乳房植入物破裂女性的首次研究,作者得出结论,植入物破裂是一种相对无害的情况,很少进展并引起明显症状。即便如此,由于存在硅胶扩散的小风险,作者建议对植入物破裂的女性进行临床随访,即便不进行手术。由于植入物破裂通常无症状发生,任何有硅胶植入物的女性,无论破裂状态如何,都应定期接受评估。