Almeda J, Casabona J, Simon B, Gerard M, Rey D, Puro V, Thomas T
CEESCAT, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Euro Surveill. 2004 Jun;9(6):35-40.
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is the standard of care for a healthcare worker (HCW) accidentally exposed to an HIV infected source person (occupational exposure), but this is not the case for non-occupational exposures. Very few national guidelines exist for the management of non-occupational exposures to HIV in Europe, contrarily to the occupational ones. The administration of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NONOPEP) for HIV may be justified by: a biological plausibility, the effectiveness of PEP in animal studies and occupational exposures in humans, efficacy in the prevention of mother to child HIV transmission, and cost effectiveness studies. These evidences, the similar risk of HIV transmission for certain non-occupational exposures to occupational ones, and the conflicting information about attitudes and practices among physicians on NONOPEP led to the proposal of these European recommendations. Participant members of the European project on HIV NONOPEP, funded by the European Commission, and acknowledged as experts in bloodborne pathogen transmission and prevention, met from December 2000 to December 2002 at three formal meetings and a two day workshop for a literature review on risk exposure assessment and the development of the European recommendations for the management of HIV NONOPEP. NONOPEP is recommended in unprotected receptive anal sex and needle or syringe exchange when the source person is known as HIV positive or from a population group with high HIV prevalence. Any combination of drugs available for HIV infected patients can be used as PEP and the simplest and least toxic regimens are to be preferred. PEP should be given within 72 hours from the time of exposure, starting as early as possible and lasting four weeks. All patients should receive medical evaluation including HIV antibody tests, drug toxicity monitoring and counseling periodically for at least 6 months after the exposure. NONOPEP seems to be a both feasible and frequent clinical practice in Europe. Recommendations for its management have been achieved by consensus, but some remain controversial, and they should be updated periodically. NONOPEP should never be considered as a primary prevention strategy and the final decision for prescription must be made on the basis of the patient-physician relationship. Finally, a surveillance system for these cases will be useful to monitor NONOPEP practices in Europe.
暴露后预防(PEP)是医护人员(HCW)意外暴露于HIV感染源个体(职业暴露)后的标准治疗方法,但非职业暴露并非如此。与职业暴露的指南相反,欧洲针对非职业性HIV暴露管理的国家指南非常少。对HIV进行非职业性暴露后预防(NONOPEP)的实施依据可能包括:生物学合理性、PEP在动物研究及人类职业暴露中的有效性、预防母婴HIV传播的功效以及成本效益研究。这些证据、某些非职业暴露与职业暴露相似的HIV传播风险,以及医生之间关于NONOPEP的态度和做法的相互矛盾的信息,促成了这些欧洲建议的提出。由欧盟委员会资助的欧洲HIV NONOPEP项目的参与成员,他们被公认为血源性病原体传播与预防方面的专家,在2000年12月至2002年12月期间参加了三次正式会议和一个为期两天的研讨会,对风险暴露评估进行文献综述,并制定欧洲HIV NONOPEP管理建议。当已知源个体为HIV阳性或来自HIV高流行人群时,建议在无保护的接受性肛交以及针头或注射器交换情况下进行NONOPEP。可用于HIV感染患者的任何药物组合都可作为PEP使用,应首选最简单且毒性最小的方案。PEP应在暴露后72小时内给予,尽早开始并持续四周。所有患者在暴露后至少6个月应定期接受包括HIV抗体检测、药物毒性监测和咨询在内的医学评估。NONOPEP在欧洲似乎是一种可行且常见的临床实践。其管理建议已通过共识达成,但有些仍存在争议,应定期更新。NONOPEP绝不应被视为主要预防策略,最终的处方决定必须基于医患关系做出。最后,针对这些病例的监测系统将有助于监测欧洲的NONOPEP实践情况。