Suppr超能文献

多中心随机试验比较阿霉素和多西他赛序贯给药与同步给药作为转移性乳腺癌一线治疗:西班牙乳腺癌研究组(GEICAM-9903)III期研究

Multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential with concomitant administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM-9903) phase III study.

作者信息

Alba Emilio, Martín Miguel, Ramos Manuel, Adrover Encarna, Balil Ana, Jara Carlos, Barnadas Agustí, Fernández-Aramburo Antonio, Sánchez-Rovira Pedro, Amenedo Margarita, Casado Antonio

机构信息

Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2587-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.125.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This randomized, multicenter, phase III trial evaluated whether sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel (A-->T) reduced hematological toxicity, especially febrile neutropenia, compared with concomitant (AT) administration as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), every 21 days (A-->T) or six cycles of the combination doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (AT) every 21 days. Patients previously treated with anthracyclines received two cycles of doxorubicin followed by four cycles of docetaxel (A-->T), or three cycles of AT followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 21 days.

RESULTS

Febrile neutropenia was less common in the A-->T arm (29.3% of patients, 6.9% of cycles) compared with the AT arm (47.8% of patients, 14.8% of cycles; P =.02 and P =.0004, respectively). Asthenia, diarrhea, and fever occurred more frequently in the AT arm. The overall responses rates were 61% in the A-->T arm (95% CI, 50% to 72%) and 51% in the AT arm (95% CI, 39% to 63%). The median duration of response was 8.7 months (A-->T) and 7.6 months (AT); the median time to progression was 10.5 months (A-->T) and 9.2 months (AT); the median overall survival was 22.3 months (A-->T) and 21.8 months (AT); and no significant differences were found.

CONCLUSION

A-->T significantly reduced febrile neutropenia compared with AT in MBC patients and maintains comparable antitumoral efficacy. A-->T represents a valid option for the treatment of MBC.

摘要

目的

本项随机、多中心、III期试验评估了在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)一线化疗中,与多柔比星和多西他赛同步给药(AT)相比,序贯给药(A→T)是否能降低血液学毒性,尤其是发热性中性粒细胞减少症。

患者与方法

144例患者被随机分配接受三个周期的多柔比星,每21天75mg/m²,随后接受三个周期的多西他赛,每21天100mg/m²(A→T),或六个周期的多柔比星50mg/m²与多西他赛75mg/m²联合用药(AT),每21天一次。既往接受过蒽环类药物治疗的患者接受两个周期的多柔比星,随后四个周期的多西他赛(A→T),或三个周期的AT,随后三个周期的多西他赛,每21天100mg/m²。

结果

与AT组相比,A→T组发热性中性粒细胞减少症不太常见(分别为29.3%的患者,6.9%的周期;47.8%的患者,14.8%的周期;P = 0.02和P = 0.0004)。AT组乏力、腹泻和发热的发生率更高。A→T组的总缓解率为61%(95%CI,50%至72%),AT组为51%(95%CI,39%至63%)。中位缓解持续时间为8.7个月(A→T)和7.6个月(AT);中位疾病进展时间为10.5个月(A→T)和9.2个月(AT);中位总生存期为22.3个月(A→T)和21.8个月(AT);未发现显著差异。

结论

与AT相比,A→T在MBC患者中显著降低了发热性中性粒细胞减少症,并维持了相当的抗肿瘤疗效。A→T是治疗MBC的一个有效选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验