Reczuch Krzysztof, Jankowska Ewa, Telichowski Artur, Porada Adam, Banasiak Waldemar, Ponikowski Piotr
Department of Cardiology, 4th Military Hospital, Wrocław, Poland.
Kardiol Pol. 2004 Apr;60(4):311-19; discussion 320-1.
Patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are selected for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) or surgical revascularisation. The appropriateness of "ad hoc" PCI of borderline lesions (<70% of lumen diameter) in patients with a multi-vessel CAD has not been proven. However, delayed PCI of another lesion and gaining additional information from non-invasive tests is not a widely accepted strategy. When left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery is one of the affected vessels, selection for surgical revascularisation is most likely.
To assess long-term outcome in patients with multi-vessel CAD and borderline lesions, including LAD, in whom fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all affected vessels was measured and used for selection for PCI or conservative treatment.
The study group consisted of 16 patients with stable angina (11 males, mean age 60+/-9 years) with 34 lesions localised in the main epicardial coronary arteries [LAD / left main (LM) / right coronary artery (RCA) / intermediate branch (IB) / circumflex artery (Cx) - 15/1/5/5/8] of which at least two were borderline stenoses. Each lesion underwent FFR measurement. "Ad hoc" PCI was performed when FFR was <0.75, and conservative therapy was instituted when FFR was >0.75.
Of 34 lesions, in 8 (23%) the FFR value was <0.75 and these lesions were treated with PCI (LAD/IB/Cx - 3/2/3). In the remaining 26 (77%) lesions, FFR was >0.75 and conservative therapy was instituted. During the mean follow-up of 15+/-6 months (range 6-28 months, median 15 months) in 8 of 9 conservatively treated patients no aggravation of anginal symptoms nor other coronary events were observed. One patient developed acute myocardial infarction due to thrombus occluding a borderline LAD lesion. Of 8 lesions treated with PCI (baseline FFR = 0.63+/-0.10 vs post-PCI FFR = 0.92+/-0.08, p=0.0002), in one case an in-stent restenosis in LAD occurred 9 months after PCI. Of a total of 26 lesions which were conservatively treated (mean FFR 0.91+/-0.05), in 2 (7.7%) the progression of CAD was noted.
In patients with multi-vessel CAD and borderline lesions, FFR measurement identifies those, who can be treated conservatively with a good long-term outcome, and prevents unnecessary PCI.
多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者可选择经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或外科血运重建术。多支CAD患者中对临界病变(管腔直径<70%)进行“临时”PCI的合理性尚未得到证实。然而,延迟对另一病变进行PCI并从无创检查中获取更多信息并非广泛接受的策略。当左前降支(LAD)冠状动脉是受累血管之一时,最有可能选择外科血运重建术。
评估多支CAD且有临界病变(包括LAD)患者的长期预后,这些患者对所有受累血管均测量了血流储备分数(FFR),并用于选择PCI或保守治疗。
研究组由16例稳定型心绞痛患者(11例男性,平均年龄60±9岁)组成,其34处病变位于主要心外膜冠状动脉[LAD/左主干(LM)/右冠状动脉(RCA)/中间支(IB)/回旋支(Cx)-15/1/5/5/8],其中至少两处为临界狭窄。对每个病变进行FFR测量。当FFR<0.75时进行“临时”PCI,当FFR>0.75时进行保守治疗。
34处病变中,8处(23%)FFR值<0.75,这些病变接受了PCI治疗(LAD/IB/Cx-3/2/3)。其余26处(77%)病变FFR>0.75,进行了保守治疗。在平均15±6个月(范围6 - 28个月,中位数15个月)的随访期间,9例接受保守治疗的患者中有8例未观察到心绞痛症状加重或其他冠状动脉事件。1例患者因血栓阻塞临界LAD病变而发生急性心肌梗死。8处接受PCI治疗的病变(基线FFR = 0.63±0.10,PCI后FFR = 0.92±0.08,p = 0.0002)中,1例在PCI术后9个月发生LAD支架内再狭窄。在总共接受保守治疗的26处病变(平均FFR 0.91±0.05)中,2处(7.7%)观察到CAD进展。
在多支CAD且有临界病变的患者中,FFR测量可识别出那些可接受保守治疗且长期预后良好的患者,并防止不必要的PCI。