Niks Milan, Hanzen Juraj, Ohlasová Daniela, Rovná Daniela, Purgelová Anna, Szövényiová Zuzana, Vaculíková Alena
Pulic health authority of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovak Republic,
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2004 Jun;10(3):124-9.
A multicenter study was conducted to obtain "in vitro" chloramphenicol and colistin susceptibility data on multiresistant hospital bacterial pathogens in Slovak Republic.
During the period of April-June 2001, 628 clinical bacterial multiresistant isolates from patients with serious infections were selected in 10 hospitals and tested to a large scale of antibiotics by means of a microdilution method. The strains expressed either a significant resistance phenotype (ESBL, MRSA, CoNMRS, MLSB/c, efflux in Ps. aeruginosa), or were resistant to one or more preparations in at least half of reliable unrelated antibiotic groups (beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, quinolons, macrolides).
Both chloramphenicol and colistin retained significant "in vitro" activity against many multiresistant hospital bacterial pathogens. The highest activity of chloramphenicol was documented for isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (76,5 % susceptible, MIC50 = 4 mg/L, MIC90 = 16 mg/L) and of Staphylococcus aureus (76,2 % susceptible, MIC50 = 8 mg/L, MIC90 = 16 mg/L). In tested Pseudomonas aeruginosa (82,5 % susceptible, MIC50 = 2 mg/L, MIC90 = 16 mg/L) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (88,2 % susceptible, MIC50 = 1 mg/L, MIC90 = 8 mg/L) isolates colistin represented the most "in vitro" effective antibiotic. Colistin was the only "in vitro" effective antimicrobial in four of 120 multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates tested in our study.
The study confirmed a good "in vitro" susceptibility of many multiresistant hospital bacterial pathogens to chloramphenicol and colistin in Slovak Republic. The clinical application of chloramphenicol and colistin might be reconsidered in infections caused by extremely resistant bacteria with prooved susceptibility to these antibiotics. It is important to consider, that the infection danger has to exceed the risk of antibiotic toxicity.
开展一项多中心研究,以获取斯洛伐克共和国医院多重耐药细菌病原体的“体外”氯霉素和黏菌素敏感性数据。
在2001年4月至6月期间,从10家医院选取了628株来自严重感染患者的临床多重耐药细菌分离株,采用微量稀释法对其进行多种抗生素的大规模检测。这些菌株要么表现出显著的耐药表型(超广谱β-内酰胺酶、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、大环内酯类耐药性/克林霉素诱导型耐药、铜绿假单胞菌的主动外排),要么对至少一半可靠的不相关抗生素组(β-内酰胺类、氨基糖苷类、喹诺酮类、大环内酯类)中的一种或多种制剂耐药。
氯霉素和黏菌素对许多医院多重耐药细菌病原体均保留显著的“体外”活性。嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌分离株(76.5%敏感,MIC50 = 4 mg/L,MIC90 = 16 mg/L)和金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(76.2%敏感,MIC50 = 8 mg/L,MIC90 = 16 mg/L)对氯霉素的活性最高。在受试的铜绿假单胞菌分离株(82.5%敏感,MIC50 = 2 mg/L,MIC90 = 16 mg/L)和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌分离株(88.2%敏感,MIC50 = 1 mg/L,MIC90 = 8 mg/L)中,黏菌素是最具“体外”活性的抗生素。在我们研究中检测的120株多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌分离株中,有4株仅对黏菌素“体外”有效。
该研究证实斯洛伐克共和国许多医院多重耐药细菌病原体对氯霉素和黏菌素具有良好的“体外”敏感性。对于由已证实对这些抗生素敏感的极度耐药细菌引起的感染,可能需要重新考虑氯霉素和黏菌素的临床应用。必须考虑到,感染风险必须超过抗生素毒性风险,这一点很重要。