Cham Swee, Basire Mary, Kelly Anne-Maree
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2004 Jun;16(3):208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00588.x.
To determine whether intermediate dose metoclopramide is more effective than standard dose metoclopramide for patients who present to the ED with nausea and vomiting.
This prospective, single-blind, randomized trial was conducted in the ED of two community teaching hospitals in a convenience sample of adult patients who presented to ED with nausea and vomiting. Patients were randomized to receive either 10 mg metoclopramide IV or 0.4 mg/kg IV (up to a maximum dose of 32 mg). The outcomes measured were: change in nausea score (measured on a 11-point verbal rating scale), requirement for other anti-emetic drug administration, and presence of side-effects.
Fifty-eight patients were eligible for analysis (34 in 10 mg group and 24 in 0.4 mg/kg group). Median reduction in nausea score in 10 mg group was four (range 0-10, 95% CI 3-5) compared with five for 0.4 mg/kg group (range -1-10, 95% CI 4-6). This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.629). Five patients in the 10 mg group required rescue anti-emetic, compared with three in the 0.4 mg/kg group (P = 1.00). There were no side-effects in the 10 mg group and two in the 0.4 mg/kg group.
This study suggests that there is no difference in effectiveness between 10 mg and 0.4 mg/kg of metoclopramide in the ED population with nausea and vomiting.
确定对于因恶心和呕吐就诊于急诊科的患者,中等剂量甲氧氯普胺是否比标准剂量甲氧氯普胺更有效。
本前瞻性、单盲、随机试验在两家社区教学医院的急诊科进行,纳入因恶心和呕吐就诊的成年患者作为便利样本。患者被随机分为静脉注射10毫克甲氧氯普胺组或静脉注射0.4毫克/千克(最大剂量32毫克)组。测量的结果包括:恶心评分的变化(采用11分语言评定量表测量)、使用其他止吐药物的需求以及副作用的发生情况。
58例患者符合分析条件(10毫克组34例,0.4毫克/千克组24例)。10毫克组恶心评分的中位数降低了4分(范围0 - 10分,95%置信区间3 - 5分),而0.4毫克/千克组为5分(范围 - 1 - 10分,95%置信区间4 - 6分)。这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.629)。10毫克组有5例患者需要抢救性使用止吐药,0.4毫克/千克组为3例(P = 1.00)。10毫克组无副作用,0.4毫克/千克组有2例出现副作用。
本研究表明,对于急诊科恶心和呕吐患者,10毫克和0.4毫克/千克的甲氧氯普胺在疗效上无差异。