Wong Kwoon Y, Cohen Ethan D, Dowling John E
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):94-107. doi: 10.1152/jn.00270.2004. Epub 2004 Jun 30.
Glutamate receptors on giant danio retinal on bipolar cells were studied with whole cell patch clamping using a slice preparation. Cone-driven on bipolars (Cbs) and mixed-input on bipolars (Mbs) were identified morphologically. Most Cbs responded to the excitatory amino acid transporter (EAAT) substrate d-aspartate but not to the group III metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonist l-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (l-AP4) or the AMPA/kainate receptor agonist kainate, suggesting EAATs are the primary glutamate receptors on Cbs. The EAAT inhibitor dl-threo-beta-benzyloxyasparate (TBOA) blocked all light-evoked responses of Cbs, suggesting these responses are mediated exclusively by EAATs. Conversely, all Mbs responded to d-aspartate and l-AP4 but not to kainate, indicating they have both EAATs and group III mGluRs (presumably mGluR6). The light responses of Mbs involve both receptors because they could be blocked by TBOA plus (RS)-alpha-cyclopropyl-4-phosphonophenylglycine (CPPG, a group III mGluR antagonist) but not by either alone. Under dark-adapted conditions, the responses of Mbs to green (rod-selective) stimuli were reduced by CPPG but enhanced by TBOA. In contrast, both antagonists reduced the responses to red (cone-selective) stimuli, although TBOA was more effective. Furthermore, under photopic conditions, TBOA failed to eliminate light-evoked responses of Mbs. Thus on Mbs, rod inputs are mediated predominantly by mGluR6, whereas cone inputs are mediated mainly by EAATs but also by mGluR6 to some extent. Finally, we explored the interactions between EAATs and mGluR6 in Mbs. Responses to d-aspartate were reduced by l-AP4 and vice versa. Therefore mGluR6 and EAATs suppress each other, and this might underlie mutual suppression between rod and cone signals in Mbs.
利用脑片标本,通过全细胞膜片钳技术研究了斑马鱼视网膜双极细胞上的谷氨酸受体。从形态学上鉴定了视锥细胞驱动的双极细胞(Cbs)和混合输入的双极细胞(Mbs)。大多数Cbs对兴奋性氨基酸转运体(EAAT)底物D-天冬氨酸有反应,但对III组代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluR)激动剂L-(+)-2-氨基-4-磷酸丁酸(L-AP4)或AMPA/海人藻酸受体激动剂海人藻酸无反应,这表明EAATs是Cbs上的主要谷氨酸受体。EAAT抑制剂D-苏式-β-苄氧基天冬氨酸(TBOA)阻断了Cbs的所有光诱发反应,表明这些反应仅由EAATs介导。相反,所有Mbs对D-天冬氨酸和L-AP4有反应,但对海人藻酸无反应,这表明它们同时具有EAATs和III组mGluRs(可能是mGluR6)。Mbs的光反应涉及这两种受体,因为它们可被TBOA加(RS)-α-环丙基-4-磷酸苯甘氨酸(CPPG,一种III组mGluR拮抗剂)阻断,但单独使用任何一种都不能阻断。在暗适应条件下,CPPG可降低Mbs对绿色(视杆细胞选择性)刺激的反应,但TBOA可增强该反应。相反,两种拮抗剂均可降低对红色(视锥细胞选择性)刺激的反应,尽管TBOA更有效。此外,在明视条件下,TBOA未能消除Mbs的光诱发反应。因此,在Mbs上,视杆细胞输入主要由mGluR6介导,而视锥细胞输入主要由EAATs介导,但在一定程度上也由mGluR6介导。最后,我们探讨了Mbs中EAATs和mGluR6之间的相互作用。L-AP4可降低对D-天冬氨酸的反应,反之亦然。因此,mGluR6和EAATs相互抑制,这可能是Mbs中视杆细胞和视锥细胞信号相互抑制的基础。