Markou S, Perimenis P, Gyftopoulos K, Athanasopoulos A, Barbalias G
Akrata Medical Center, Greece.
Int J Impot Res. 2004 Dec;16(6):470-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901258.
Trials of the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction (ED) were meta-analysed. All available databases were searched (January 1, 2001-November 30, 2003). Trials were eligible if they included men with ED, compared vardenafil with placebo, were randomized, were at least of 12 weeks duration, and assessed clinically relevant outcomes. Two reviewers independently evaluated study quality and extracted data in a standardized fashion. Nine trials (6809 men) met the inclusion criteria. In results pooled from seven fixed-dose trials, vardenafil increases the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire by 6.18 units (weighted mean difference (WMD)). Vardenafil also increases the percentage of erections firm enough to allow vaginal penetration (WMD: 26) and the percentage of sexual attempts that were successful per participant (WMD: 29.8). The percentage of men agreeing with the statement that 'the treatment they have been taking over the past 4 weeks improved their erections', is also in favour of vardenafil (relative risk (RR): 3). These efficacy variables appeared greater at higher doses, although there are no significant differences between 10 and 20 mg dose. The same results were extracted for the two flexible 'as needed' dosing trials. Discontinuations are greater at the vardenafil groups compared to placebo (RR: 2.25). Specific adverse events with vardenafil included flushing, dyspepsia, headache, and rhinitis. Vardenafil was not significantly associated with serious cardiovascular events or death. Vardenafil, in all treatment regimens, shows to possess superior efficacy to placebo in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction. More data is needed on patients' subgroups.
对伐地那非治疗男性勃起功能障碍(ED)的疗效和安全性进行了荟萃分析。检索了所有可用数据库(2001年1月1日至2003年11月30日)。纳入标准为:研究对象为患有ED的男性;将伐地那非与安慰剂进行比较;随机分组;疗程至少12周;评估临床相关结局。两名研究者独立评估研究质量并以标准化方式提取数据。9项试验(6809名男性)符合纳入标准。在7项固定剂量试验的汇总结果中,伐地那非使国际勃起功能指数问卷的勃起功能领域增加6.18个单位(加权平均差(WMD))。伐地那非还增加了硬度足以进行阴道插入的勃起百分比(WMD:26)以及每位参与者成功性交尝试的百分比(WMD:29.8)。同意“过去4周所接受的治疗改善了勃起功能”这一说法的男性百分比也有利于伐地那非(相对危险度(RR):3)。尽管10 mg和20 mg剂量之间无显著差异,但这些疗效变量在较高剂量时似乎更大。两项灵活的“按需”给药试验也得出了相同结果。与安慰剂组相比,伐地那非组的停药率更高(RR:2.25)。伐地那非的特定不良事件包括潮红、消化不良、头痛和鼻炎。伐地那非与严重心血管事件或死亡无显著关联。在所有治疗方案中,伐地那非在治疗勃起功能障碍患者方面显示出优于安慰剂的疗效。关于患者亚组还需要更多数据。