Stueckle Christoph A, Haegele Kerstin F, Jendreck Martin, Zipser Marie C, Kirchner Johannes, Kickuth Ralph, Liermann Dieter
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Marienhospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr-University-Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Australas Radiol. 2004 Jun;48(2):142-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01275.x.
Since the introduction of multislice CT scanners, CT angiography (CTA) has become a powerful tool for imaging the vascular system. We compare conventional angiography to CTA in the diagnosis of morphological changes in the abdominal aorta and its branches. A retrospective analysis of 52 patients who underwent both multislice CT angiography (MSCTA) and digital subtraction angiography before surgical treatment is presented. All CT examinations were performed after administration of 100 mL contrast medium with a collimation of 4 x 1 mm and a pitch of 7. A standardized evaluation of the axial, multiplanar and 3D reconstructions was performed by two experienced radiologists. Stenoses were classified as high-grade and low-grade, and aneurysms, occlusions and arteriosclerosis were evaluated. The CTA findings were compared with conventional angiography. All aneurysms, occlusions, stenoses and calcifications were diagnosed correctly by CTA in axial and multiplanar projections (sensitivity 1.0; specificity 1.0). The degree of stenosis was overestimated in three cases when using axial projections. Three-dimensional volume-rendered CTA showed a sensitivity of 0.91 for aneurysms, 0.82 for stenoses, 0.75 for occlusions and 0.77 for calcifications. The specificity was 1.0 in all cases. Multislice CT angiography seems to be similar to conventional digital subtraction angiography for abdominal vessels if multiplanar projections are used.
自从多层CT扫描仪问世以来,CT血管造影(CTA)已成为血管系统成像的有力工具。我们比较了传统血管造影与CTA在腹主动脉及其分支形态学变化诊断中的应用。本文对52例在手术治疗前行多层CT血管造影(MSCTA)和数字减影血管造影的患者进行了回顾性分析。所有CT检查均在静脉注射100 mL造影剂后进行,准直器为4×1 mm,螺距为7。由两名经验丰富的放射科医生对轴位、多平面和三维重建进行标准化评估。狭窄分为重度和轻度,并对动脉瘤、闭塞和动脉硬化进行评估。将CTA结果与传统血管造影结果进行比较。在轴位和多平面投影中,CTA对所有动脉瘤、闭塞、狭窄和钙化的诊断均正确(敏感性1.0;特异性1.0)。使用轴位投影时,有3例狭窄程度被高估。三维容积再现CTA对动脉瘤的敏感性为0.91,对狭窄为0.82,对闭塞为0.75,对钙化为0.77。所有病例的特异性均为1.0。如果使用多平面投影,多层CT血管造影对于腹部血管的诊断似乎与传统数字减影血管造影相似。