Budny Adam
St. Vincent's Charity Hospital, 2351 East 122nd Street, Cleveland, OH 44125, USA.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004 Jul;21(3):449-60, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2004.03.003.
There has been extensive research and investigation into the subtalar joint (STJ), yet the biomechanics that relate to its anatomic function, especially instability after injury, are surrounded by controversy. With a mechanism of injury closely related to the classic inversion ankle sprain, chronic instability can result following trauma to the lateral ligamentous support network of either joint. Over the past decades there have been countless examples in the literature challenging the current standard of evaluation and treatment of the "subtalar sprain." New technologies have offered varied approaches to diagnostic capability, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, ranging from standard radiographs to CT and MRI. A review of the literature should aid in deciphering the controversy surrounding this aspect of podiatric medicine.
对于距下关节(STJ)已经进行了广泛的研究和调查,然而,与其解剖功能相关的生物力学,尤其是损伤后的不稳定情况,仍存在争议。由于损伤机制与典型的内翻踝关节扭伤密切相关,任何一个关节的外侧韧带支持网络受到创伤后都可能导致慢性不稳定。在过去几十年里,文献中有无数例子对当前“距下关节扭伤”的评估和治疗标准提出了挑战。新技术为诊断能力提供了多种方法,从标准X线片到CT和MRI,每种方法都有其自身的优缺点。对文献的回顾应有助于解读围绕足病医学这一方面的争议。