Ohno Yoshiharu, Hatabu Hiroto, Takenaka Daisuke, Imai Masatake, Ohbayashi Chiho, Sugimura Kazuro
Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.
Eur J Radiol. 2004 Aug;51(2):160-8. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00216-X.
To evaluate the utility of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) image for CT-guided biopsy and determine factors of influencing diagnostic accuracy and the pneumothorax rate.
390 patients with 396 pulmonary nodules underwent transthoracic CT-guided aspiration biopsy (TNAB) and transthoracic CT-guided cutting needle core biopsy (TCNB) as follows: 250 solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) underwent conventional CT-guided biopsy (conventional method), 81 underwent CT-fluoroscopic biopsy (CT-fluoroscopic method) and 65 underwent conventional CT-guided biopsy in combination with MPR image (MPR method). Success rate, overall diagnostic accuracy, pneumothorax rate and total procedure time were compared in each method. Factors affecting diagnostic accuracy and pneumothorax rate of CT-guided biopsy were statistically evaluated.
Success rates (TNAB: 100.0%, TCNB: 100.0%) and overall diagnostic accuracies (TNAB: 96.9%, TCNB: 97.0%) of MPR were significantly higher than those using the conventional method (TNAB: 87.6 and 82.4%, TCNB: 86.3 and 81.3%) (P < 0.05). Diagnostic accuracy were influenced by biopsy method, lesion size, and needle path length (P < 0.05). Pneumothorax rate was influenced by pathological diagnostic method, lesion size, number of punctures and FEV1.0% (P < 0.05).
The use of MPR for CT-guided lung biopsy is useful for improving diagnostic accuracy with no significant increase in pneumothorax rate or total procedure time.
评估多平面重建(MPR)图像在CT引导下活检中的应用价值,并确定影响诊断准确性和气胸发生率的因素。
对390例患有396个肺结节的患者进行了经胸CT引导下细针穿刺活检(TNAB)和经胸CT引导下切割针芯活检(TCNB),具体如下:250个孤立性肺结节(SPN)接受传统CT引导下活检(传统方法),81个接受CT透视活检(CT透视方法),65个接受传统CT引导下活检联合MPR图像(MPR方法)。比较每种方法的成功率、总体诊断准确性、气胸发生率和总操作时间。对影响CT引导下活检诊断准确性和气胸发生率的因素进行统计学评估。
MPR的成功率(TNAB:100.0%,TCNB:100.0%)和总体诊断准确性(TNAB:96.9%,TCNB:97.0%)显著高于传统方法(TNAB:87.6%和82.4%,TCNB:86.3%和81.3%)(P<0.05)。诊断准确性受活检方法、病变大小和针道长度影响(P<0.05)。气胸发生率受病理诊断方法、病变大小、穿刺次数和FEV1.0%影响(P<0.05)。
在CT引导下肺活检中使用MPR有助于提高诊断准确性,且气胸发生率和总操作时间无显著增加。