Roulin Alexandre
Laboratoire Génétique de l'Environnement, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR5554), Université Montpellier II, Bâtiment 22, 1er étage Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France.
Oecologia. 2004 Aug;140(4):668-75. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1636-x. Epub 2004 Jul 10.
In contradiction to sexual selection theory, several studies showed that although the expression of melanin-based ornaments is usually under strong genetic control and weakly sensitive to the environment and body condition, they can signal individual quality. Covariation between a melanin-based ornament and phenotypic quality may result from pleiotropic effects of genes involved in the production of melanin pigments. Two categories of genes responsible for variation in melanin production may be relevant, namely those that trigger melanin production (yes or no response) and those that determine the amount of pigments produced. To investigate which of these two hypotheses is the most likely, I reanalysed data collected from barn owls ( Tyto alba). The underparts of this bird vary from immaculate to heavily marked with black spots of varying size. Published cross-fostering experiments have shown that the proportion of the plumage surface covered with black spots, a eumelanin composite trait so-called "plumage spottiness", in females positively covaries with offspring humoral immunocompetence, and negatively with offspring parasite resistance (i.show $132#e. the ability to reduce fecundity of ectoparasites) and fluctuating asymmetry of wing feathers. However, it is unclear which component of plumage spottiness causes these relationships, namely genes responsible for variation in number of spots or in spot diameter. Number of spots reflects variation in the expression of genes triggering the switch from no eumelanin production to production, whereas spot diameter reflects variation in the expression of genes determining the amount of eumelanin produced per spot. In the present study, multiple regression analyses, performed on the same data sets, showed that humoral immunocompetence, parasite resistance and wing fluctuating asymmetry of cross-fostered offspring covary with spot diameter measured in their genetic mother, but not with number of spots. This suggests that genes responsible for variation in the quantity of eumelanin produced per spot are responsible for covariation between a melanin ornament and individual attributes. In contrast, genes responsible for variation in number of black spots may not play a significant role. Covariation between a eumelanin female trait and offspring quality may therefore be due to an indirect effect of melanin production.
与性选择理论相反,多项研究表明,尽管基于黑色素的饰纹表达通常受到强大的基因控制,对环境和身体状况的敏感性较弱,但它们仍能体现个体品质。基于黑色素的饰纹与表型品质之间的协变可能源于参与黑色素生成的基因的多效性效应。两类负责黑色素生成变异的基因可能与之相关,即那些触发黑色素生成的基因(产生或不产生反应)以及那些决定所产生色素量的基因。为了探究这两种假设中哪一种最有可能,我重新分析了从仓鸮(Tyto alba)收集的数据。这种鸟类的下体从无斑点到布满大小各异的黑色斑点。已发表的交叉寄养实验表明,雌性身上覆盖黑色斑点的羽毛表面比例,即一种称为“羽毛斑点度”的真黑色素复合性状,与后代的体液免疫能力呈正相关,与后代的寄生虫抗性呈负相关(即降低体外寄生虫繁殖力的能力)以及与翅羽的波动不对称性呈负相关。然而,尚不清楚羽毛斑点度的哪个组成部分导致了这些关系,即负责斑点数量变异的基因还是负责斑点直径变异的基因。斑点数量反映了触发从无真黑色素产生到产生真黑色素转变的基因表达变异,而斑点直径反映了决定每个斑点产生真黑色素量的基因表达变异。在本研究中,对相同数据集进行的多元回归分析表明,交叉寄养后代的体液免疫能力、寄生虫抗性和翅羽波动不对称性与在其基因母亲身上测量的斑点直径协变,但与斑点数量无关。这表明负责每个斑点产生真黑色素量变异的基因是导致黑色素饰纹与个体属性之间协变的原因。相比之下,负责黑色斑点数量变异的基因可能不起重要作用。因此,真黑色素雌性性状与后代品质之间的协变可能是黑色素生成间接作用的结果。