Suppr超能文献

学龄前听力筛查:北卡罗来纳州东部一个启智计划中登记儿童的通过/转诊率

Preschool hearing screening: pass/refer rates for children enrolled in a head start program in eastern North Carolina.

作者信息

Allen Rose L, Stuart Andrew, Everett Deborah, Elangovan Saravanan

机构信息

East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2004 Jun;13(1):29-38. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/006).

Abstract

This 4-year project investigated the pass/refer rates of preschool children in a hearing screening program. Three- and 4-year-old children who attended Head Start centers in rural, traditionally medically underserved, eastern North Carolina participated (n = 1,462). Screening procedures and pass/refer criteria were based on the Guidelines for Audiologic Screening (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association [ASHA], Panel on Audiologic Assessment, 1997). Only 54% (n = 787) of children passed the initial screening (i.e., passed all three of the screening components, which included pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, and otoscopy), and an additional 22% (n = 323) passed the rescreening, for an overall pass rate of 76%. The initial pass rate was 90%, 71%, and 71% for otoscopy, tympanometry, and pure-tone audiometry, respectively. After the initial screening, 675 children were referred (i.e., 83%, 2%, and 15% for audiologic rescreening, medical evaluation, or both, respectively). About 71% (n = 478) received the recommended evaluation. Follow-up assessment compliance after the rescreening was poor. Slightly more than 10% of children were evaluated. The hearing status of 267 (i.e., 18.3%) children was never determined. Six (i.e., 0.5%) of the 1,195 children who completed the audiologic screening and/or received diagnostic audiologic assessment were confirmed to have hearing loss. Methodological factors that may have contributed to this high refer rate include the use of all screening techniques (pure tones, tympanometry, and otoscopy), procedural considerations in testing protocol and pass/refer criteria, and the demographic characteristics of the children screened.

摘要

这个为期4年的项目调查了学龄前儿童听力筛查项目中的通过/转诊率。北卡罗来纳州东部农村地区、传统上医疗服务不足的“启智计划”中心的3岁和4岁儿童参与了该项目(n = 1462)。筛查程序和通过/转诊标准基于《听力学筛查指南》(美国言语语言听力协会[ASHA],听力学评估小组,1997年)。只有54%(n = 787)的儿童通过了初次筛查(即通过了所有三个筛查部分,包括纯音听力测定、鼓室图和耳镜检查),另有22%(n = 323)的儿童通过了复查,总体通过率为76%。耳镜检查、鼓室图和纯音听力测定的初次通过率分别为90%、71%和71%。初次筛查后,675名儿童被转诊(即分别有83%、2%和15%的儿童需要进行听力学复查、医学评估或两者皆需)。约71%(n = 478)的儿童接受了推荐的评估。复查后的随访评估依从性较差。略多于10%的儿童接受了评估。267名(即18.3%)儿童的听力状况从未得到确定。在1,195名完成听力学筛查和/或接受诊断性听力学评估的儿童中,有6名(即0.5%)被确诊患有听力损失。可能导致这种高转诊率的方法学因素包括所有筛查技术(纯音、鼓室图和耳镜检查)的使用、测试方案和通过/转诊标准中的程序考虑因素以及被筛查儿童的人口统计学特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验