Niemann C U, Hirose R, Stock P, Roberts J P, Mandell S, Spencer Yost C
Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, 94143, USA.
Transplant Proc. 2004 Jun;36(5):1466-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.04.098.
Living donor liver transplantation has increasingly become an alternative to cadaveric donor liver transplants for select adult patients. Because these cases can be performed electively, living donor recipients may have better compensated liver disease at the time of surgery than cadaver donor recipients. However, it is unknown if this difference would have a significant effect on their intraoperative course. Therefore, we compared the intraoperative fluid management of patients receiving liver grafts from either living or cadaveric donors (n = 25, each group). Patient groups did not differ in demographics or baseline laboratory values. The duration of anesthesia and anhepatic phases were significantly longer in living donor cases (651 +/- 80 minutes vs 409 +/- 20 and 55 +/- 14 vs 45 +/- 6, P < .05). Adjusted for anesthesia time and patient weight, fluid administration (crystalloid and albumin) was not different between the two groups. Intraoperative transfusion requirements were also not significantly different in recipients from living donors versus cadaveric donors with regard to red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate. However, arterial oxygenation was better preserved in recipients from living donors. The PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio at the end of the procedure was significantly better in patients receiving livers from living rather than from cadaveric donors (P/F ratio 335 +/- 114 mm Hg vs 271 +/- 174, P < .05). Our results indicate that while intraoperative fluid and transfusion requirements are similar, the impact of transplantation on pulmonary gas exchange is more pronounced in patients receiving organs from cadaveric donors. This difference may arise from longer cold ischemia times present in the cadaveric donor group.
对于部分成年患者而言,活体供肝移植已日益成为尸体供肝移植的一种替代选择。由于这些病例可以择期进行,活体供肝受者在手术时的肝脏疾病代偿情况可能比尸体供肝受者更好。然而,这种差异是否会对其术中过程产生显著影响尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了接受活体或尸体供肝移植患者(每组n = 25)的术中液体管理情况。患者组在人口统计学或基线实验室值方面没有差异。活体供肝病例的麻醉和无肝期持续时间明显更长(651±80分钟对409±20分钟,55±14分钟对45±6分钟,P <.05)。校正麻醉时间和患者体重后,两组之间的液体输注量(晶体液和白蛋白)没有差异。在红细胞、新鲜冰冻血浆、血小板和冷沉淀方面,活体供肝受者与尸体供肝受者的术中输血需求也没有显著差异。然而,活体供肝受者的动脉氧合情况得到了更好的维持。接受活体供肝患者在手术结束时的PaO2/FiO2(P/F)比值明显优于接受尸体供肝的患者(P/F比值335±114 mmHg对271±174,P <.05)。我们的结果表明,虽然术中液体和输血需求相似,但移植对肺气体交换的影响在接受尸体供肝的患者中更为明显。这种差异可能源于尸体供肝组较长的冷缺血时间。