Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病患者持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次胰岛素注射治疗的比较:18个月随访

Comparison between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple insulin injection therapy in type 1 diabetes mellitus: 18-month follow-up.

作者信息

Hissa Miguel N, Hissa Ana Sofia R, Bruin Veralice M S, Fredrickson Linda P

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2002 Nov-Dec;8(6):411-6. doi: 10.4158/EP.8.6.411.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin in the treatment of type 1 diabetes during 18 months of follow-up.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 29 patients with type 1 diabetes in Brazil; 17 patients elected to change from conventional insulin therapy (2 injections daily) (N = 3) or MDI (N = 14) to CSII therapy, and the other 12 continued to receive MDI therapy. All patients were treated with insulin lispro; patients in the MDI treatment group also received NPH insulin. We compared hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values, determined at baseline and every 3 months, between the two treatment groups. Other variables analyzed included weight, body mass index, total daily dose of insulin, and incidence of severe hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Patients in the CSII group had a significant decrease (P<0.001) in mean HbA1c at 18 months in comparison with baseline (8.3% versus 6.5%). In the MDI group, no significant changes were found in mean HbA1c. After 3 months of treatment, patients in the CSII group had a significantly lower mean HbA1c level than did patients receiving MDI (P<0.05). Of the 17 patients treated with CSII, all had HbA1c values less than 7.5% at 18 months, and 13 (76%) had HbA1c levels less than 7%. Although no significant variations in weight were observed in either group, the insulin/weight ratio decreased in the CSII group from baseline to 18 months (0.8 U/kg to 0.6 U/kg; P = 0.02). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia were noted in either group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro have better glycemic control with CSII than with MDI. Most of our patients in the CSII group were able to achieve target HbA1c levels less than 7% at 18 months without an increase in hypoglycemic episodes.

摘要

目的

比较持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)与多次皮下注射胰岛素(MDI)治疗1型糖尿病18个月随访期的结果。

方法

我们对巴西的29例1型糖尿病患者进行了前瞻性研究;17例患者选择从传统胰岛素治疗(每日2次注射)(n = 3)或MDI(n = 14)转换为CSII治疗,另外12例继续接受MDI治疗。所有患者均使用赖脯胰岛素治疗;MDI治疗组的患者还接受了中效胰岛素。我们比较了两个治疗组在基线时以及每3个月测定的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值。分析的其他变量包括体重、体重指数、胰岛素每日总剂量和严重低血糖的发生率。

结果

与基线相比,CSII组患者在18个月时平均HbA1c显著降低(P<0.001)(8.3%对6.5%)。在MDI组中,平均HbA1c未发现显著变化。治疗3个月后,CSII组患者的平均HbA1c水平显著低于接受MDI治疗的患者(P<0.05)。在接受CSII治疗的17例患者中,所有患者在18个月时HbA1c值均低于7.5%,13例(76%)HbA1c水平低于7%。尽管两组体重均未观察到显著变化,但CSII组从基线到18个月胰岛素/体重比下降(0.8 U/kg至0.6 U/kg;P = 0.02)。两组均未观察到严重低血糖事件。

结论

使用赖脯胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者,CSII比MDI能更好地控制血糖。我们CSII组的大多数患者在18个月时能够达到HbA1c目标水平低于7%,且低血糖事件未增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验