Richman Peter B, Loutfi Hassan, Lester Steven J, Cambell Patricia, Matthews Jessica, Friese Jeremy, Wood Joseph, Kasper David, Chen Frederick, Mandell Mark
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2004 Aug;27(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.04.007.
To assess the pre-study, null hypothesis that there is no difference in the electrocardiogram (EKG) findings for Emergency Department (ED) patients who rule in vs. rule out for suspected pulmonary embolism, a retrospective review of a cohort of patients with pulmonary embolism and their controls was conducted in an academic, suburban ED. Patients who were evaluated in the ED during a one-year study period for symptoms suggestive of pulmonary embolism were eligible for inclusion. All patients with pulmonary embolism and sex- and age-matched controls comprised the final study groups. Two board-certified cardiologists reviewed each patient's EKG. There were 350 eligible patients identified; 49 patients with pulmonary embolism and 49 controls were entered into the study. The most common rhythm observed in both groups was normal sinus rhythm (67.3% cases vs. 68.6 % controls; p = 1.0). Abnormalities believed to be associated with pulmonary embolism occurred with similar frequency in both case and control groups (sinus tachycardia [18.8 % vs. 11.8%, respectively; p = 0.40]), incomplete right bundle branch block (4.2% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = 0.24), complete right bundle branch block (4.2% vs. 6.0, respectively; p = 1.0), S1Q3T3 pattern (2.1 vs. 0.0, respectively; p = 0.49), S1Q3 pattern (0.0 vs. 0.0), and extreme right axis (0.0 vs. 0.0). New EKG changes were identified more frequently for patients with pulmonary embolism (33.3% vs. 12.5% controls; p = 0.03), but specific findings were rarely different between cases and controls. In our cohort of ED patients, we did not identify EKG features that are likely to help distinguish patients with pulmonary embolism from those who rule out for the disease.
为了评估研究前的零假设,即对于急诊科(ED)中因疑似肺栓塞而确诊与排除的患者,其心电图(EKG)结果没有差异,在一家学术性的郊区急诊科对一组肺栓塞患者及其对照进行了回顾性研究。在为期一年的研究期间,在急诊科接受评估且有提示肺栓塞症状的患者符合纳入标准。所有肺栓塞患者以及性别和年龄匹配的对照构成了最终的研究组。两位具备委员会认证的心脏病专家对每位患者的心电图进行了复查。共识别出350名符合条件的患者;49名肺栓塞患者和49名对照被纳入研究。两组中观察到的最常见心律均为正常窦性心律(病例组为67.3%,对照组为68.6%;p = 1.0)。被认为与肺栓塞相关的异常在病例组和对照组中出现的频率相似(窦性心动过速[分别为18.8%对11.8%;p = 0.40])、不完全性右束支传导阻滞(分别为4.2%对0.0%;p = 0.24)、完全性右束支传导阻滞(分别为4.2%对6.0%;p = 1.0)、S1Q3T3型(分别为2.1对0.0;p = 0.49)、S1Q3型(0.0对0.0)以及极度右轴偏移(0.0对0.0)。肺栓塞患者出现新的心电图变化更为频繁(病例组为33.3%,对照组为12.5%;p = 0.03),但病例组和对照组之间的具体表现很少有差异。在我们的急诊科患者队列中,我们未发现有助于将肺栓塞患者与排除该疾病的患者区分开来的心电图特征。