Suppr超能文献

当不同抗菌剂混合时亲水性底漆的有效性。

Effectiveness of a hydrophilic primer when different antimicrobial agents are mixed.

作者信息

Karaman Ali Ihya, Uysal Tancan

机构信息

Selcuk University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):414-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0414:EOAHPW>2.0.CO;2.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether different types of antimicrobial agents with hydrophilic primer applied to etched enamel surfaces will affect the shear bond strength (SBS) and the bracket/adhesive failure modes of metallic orthodontic brackets. Eighty noncarious human premolars were divided into four groups of 20 each. A composite resin (Transbond XT) was used to bond stainless steel brackets. Teeth in the first group were used as a control and bonded with standard procedures. For the other three groups, mixtures containing a hydrophilic primer (Transbond MIP) and one of three anti-microbial agents were prepared (Cervitec: in 1:2 ratio; chlorhexidine mouthwash and EC40 varnish in 1:1 ratio). These mixtures were applied to the etched enamel surfaces and thoroughly light cured for 20 seconds, and the brackets were bonded and light cured for 40 seconds. The SBS values of these brackets (Mpa) were recorded using a universal testing machine. Adhesive Remnant Index scores were determined after failure of the brackets. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey honestly significant difference, and chi-square tests. Results of ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in bond strengths among the various groups tested (P < .05). The bond strength values in these four groups compared favorably with those from other studies and the minimal bond strength values that are clinically acceptable. However, results of this study demonstrated that groups 1 (control) and 2 (Cervitec varnish) had higher SBS values than the other applications. Application of different antimicrobial agents may result in differences in the site of failure.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定将不同类型的带有亲水性底漆的抗菌剂应用于酸蚀后的牙釉质表面时,是否会影响金属正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度(SBS)以及托槽/粘结剂的失效模式。80颗无龋坏的人类前磨牙被分为四组,每组20颗。使用复合树脂(Transbond XT)粘结不锈钢托槽。第一组牙齿用作对照,采用标准程序进行粘结。对于其他三组,制备了含有亲水性底漆(Transbond MIP)和三种抗菌剂之一的混合物(Cervitec:比例为1:2;洗必泰漱口水和EC40清漆,比例为1:1)。将这些混合物应用于酸蚀后的牙釉质表面,并充分光照固化20秒,然后粘结托槽并光照固化40秒。使用万能试验机记录这些托槽的SBS值(兆帕)。托槽脱粘后确定粘结剂残留指数得分。使用方差分析(ANOVA)、Tukey真实显著性差异检验和卡方检验对数据进行分析。方差分析结果显示,在所测试的各个组之间,粘结强度存在统计学上的显著差异(P < 0.05)。这四组的粘结强度值与其他研究的结果以及临床上可接受的最小粘结强度值相比具有优势。然而,本研究结果表明,第1组(对照组)和第2组(Cervitec清漆组)的SBS值高于其他应用组。应用不同的抗菌剂可能会导致失效部位的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验