Suppr超能文献

用于治疗精神分裂症的长效癸酸溴哌利多

Depot bromperidol decanoate for schizophrenia.

作者信息

Wong D, Adams C E, David A, Quraishi S N

机构信息

Academic Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, 15 Hyde Terrace, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK, LS2 9LT.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001719. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001719.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs are the mainstay treatment for schizophrenia. Long-acting depot injections of drugs such as bromperidol decanoate are extensively used as a means of long-term maintenance treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of depot bromperidol versus placebo, oral antipsychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant trials were identified by searching Biological Abstracts (1982-1999), Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1999), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (May 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999) and PsycLIT (1974-1999). References of all identified trials were inspected and Janssen-Cilag was contacted in order to identify more trials. An update search was undertaken in October 2003. The Schizophrenia Groups trials register is based on regular searches of BIOSIS Inside; CENTRAL; CINAHL; EMBASE; MEDLINE and PsycINFO; the hand searching of relevant journals and conference proceedings, and searches of several key grey literature sources. A full description is given in the Group's module.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where depot bromperidol, oral antipsychotics or other depot preparations were sought. Primary outcomes were death, clinically significant change in global function, mental state, relapse, hospital admission, adverse effects and acceptability of treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and cross-checked. Fixed effects relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous data. Weighted or standardised means were calculated for continuous data. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.

MAIN RESULTS

Four controlled clinical trials were included (total n=117). We identified a single small study of six months duration comparing bromperidol decanoate with placebo injection. Similar numbers left the study before completion (n=20, 1 RCT, RR 0.4 CI 0.1 to 1.6) and there was no clear differences between bromperidol decanoate and placebo for a list of adverse effects (n=20, 1 RCT, RR akathisia 2.0 CI 0.21 to 18.69, RR increased weight 3.0 CI 0.14 to 65.9, RR tremor 0.33 CI 0.04 to 2.69). When bromperidol decanoate was compared with fluphenazine depot we found no important change on global outcome (n=30, RR no clinical important improvement 1.50 CI 0.29 to 7.73). People allocated to fluphenazine decanoate and haloperidol decanoate had less relapses than those given bromperidol decanoate (n=77, RR 3.92 Cl 1.05 to 14.60, NNH 6 CI 2 to 341). People allocated bromperidol decanoate required additional antipsychotic medication somewhat more frequently than those taking fluphenazine decanoate and haloperidol decanoate but the results did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance (n=77, 2 RCTs, RR 1.72 CI 0.7 to 4.2). The use of benzodiazepine drugs was very similar in both groups (n=77, 2 RCTs, RR 1.08 CI 0.68 to 1.70). People left the bromperidol decanoate group with the same frequency as those allocated other depots (n=97, 3 RCTs, RR 1.92 CI 0.8 to 4.6). Anticholinergic adverse effects were equally common between bromperidol and other depots (n=47, RR 3.13 CI 0.7 to 14.0) and additional anticholinergic medication was needed with equal frequency in both depot groups, although results did tend to favour the bromperidol decanoate group (n=97, 3 RCTs, RR 0.80 CI 0.64 to 1.01). The incidence of movement disorders was similar in both depot groups (n=77, 2 RCTs, RR 0.74 CI 0.47 to 1.17).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently, minimal poorly reported trial data suggests that bromperidol decanoate may be better than placebo injection but less valuable than fluphenazine or haloperidol decanoate. If bromperidol decanoate is available it may be a viable choice, especially when there are reasons not to use fluphenazine or haloperidol decanoate. Well-conducted and reported randomised trials are needed to inform practice in Belgium, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands.

摘要

背景

抗精神病药物是精神分裂症的主要治疗手段。长效癸酸溴哌利多等药物的注射剂被广泛用作长期维持治疗的一种方式。

目的

从临床、社会和经济结果方面评估癸酸溴哌利多与安慰剂、口服抗精神病药物及其他长效抗精神病药物制剂对精神分裂症患者的疗效。

检索策略

通过检索生物摘要数据库(1982 - 1999年)、考克兰图书馆(1999年第2期)、考克兰精神分裂症研究组注册库(1999年5月)、EMBASE数据库(1980 - 1999年)、MEDLINE数据库(1966 - 1999年)和心理学文摘数据库(1974 - 1999年)确定相关试验。检查所有已确定试验的参考文献,并与杨森-西拉格公司联系以确定更多试验。2003年10月进行了更新检索。精神分裂症研究组试验注册库基于对BIOSIS Inside、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和PsycINFO的定期检索;对相关期刊和会议论文集的手工检索,以及对几个关键灰色文献来源的检索。该研究组模块中有完整描述。

选择标准

所有聚焦于精神分裂症患者且比较癸酸溴哌利多、口服抗精神病药物或其他长效制剂的随机试验。主要结局为死亡、整体功能的临床显著变化、精神状态、复发、住院、不良反应及治疗的可接受性。

数据收集与分析

由两名审阅者独立提取数据并进行交叉核对。对二分数据计算固定效应相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。对连续数据计算加权或标准化均值。尽可能计算治疗所需人数统计量(NNT)。分析采用意向性分析。

主要结果

纳入四项对照临床试验(共117例)。我们确定了一项为期六个月的小型研究,比较癸酸溴哌利多与安慰剂注射剂。在完成前退出研究的人数相似(n = 20,1项随机对照试验,RR 0.4,CI 0.1至1.6),且在一系列不良反应方面,癸酸溴哌利多与安慰剂之间无明显差异(n = 20,1项随机对照试验,RR静坐不能2.0,CI 0.21至18.69,RR体重增加3.0,CI 0.14至65.9,RR震颤0.33,CI 0.04至2.69)。当比较癸酸溴哌利多与氟奋乃静长效注射剂时,我们发现整体结局无重要变化(n = 30,RR无临床重要改善1.50,CI 0.29至7.73)。分配到氟奋乃静癸酸酯和氟哌啶醇癸酸酯组的患者复发率低于给予癸酸溴哌利多组(n = 77,RR 3.92,Cl 1.05至14.60,NNH 6,CI 2至341)。分配到癸酸溴哌利多组的患者比服用氟奋乃静癸酸酯和氟哌啶醇癸酸酯组的患者更频繁地需要额外的抗精神病药物,但结果未达到传统统计学显著水平(n = 77,2项随机对照试验,RR 1.72,CI 0.7至4.2)。两组中苯二氮䓬类药物的使用非常相似(n = 77,2项随机对照试验,RR 1.08,CI 0.68至1.70)。离开癸酸溴哌利多组的患者频率与分配到其他长效制剂组的患者相同(n = 97,3项随机对照试验,RR 1.92,CI 0.8至4.6)。溴哌利多与其他长效制剂的抗胆碱能不良反应同样常见(n = 47,RR 3.13,CI 0.7至14.0),且两个长效制剂组中需要额外抗胆碱能药物的频率相同,尽管结果确实倾向于癸酸溴哌利多组(n = 97,3项随机对照试验,RR 0.80,CI 0.64至1.01)。两个长效制剂组的运动障碍发生率相似(n = 77,2项随机对照试验,RR 0.74,CI 0.47至1.17)。

审阅者结论

目前,极少且报告不佳的试验数据表明,癸酸溴哌利多可能优于安慰剂注射剂,但比氟奋乃静或氟哌啶醇癸酸酯价值更低。如果有癸酸溴哌利多可用,它可能是一个可行的选择,特别是当有理由不使用氟奋乃静或氟哌啶醇癸酸酯时。需要开展设计良好且报告规范的随机试验,为比利时、德国、意大利和荷兰的临床实践提供依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验