Ejere H, Alhassan M B, Rabiu M
Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group, International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK, WC1E 7HT.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003659. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003659.pub2.
Trachoma remains a major cause of avoidable blindness among underprivileged populations in many developing countries. It is estimated that about 146 million people have active trachoma and nearly six million people are blind due to complications associated with repeat infections.
The objective of this review is to assess the effects of face washing on the prevalence of active trachoma in endemic communities.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group trials register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004), EMBASE (1980 to February 2004), the reference lists of identified trials and the Science Citation Index. We also contacted investigators and experts in the field to identify additional trials.
We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials, comparing face washing with no treatment or face washing combined with antibiotics against antibiotics alone. Participants in the trials were people normally resident in endemic trachoma communities.
Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Two clinically heterogeneous trials are included, therefore a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate.
This review includes two trials with data from a total of 2560 participants. Face washing combined with topical tetracycline was compared to topical tetracycline alone in three pairs of villages in one trial. The trial found a statistically significant effect for face washing combined with topical tetracycline in reducing 'severe' active trachoma compared to topical tetracycline alone. No statistically significant difference was observed between the intervention and control villages in reducing ('non-severe') active trachoma. The prevalence of clean faces was higher in the intervention villages than the control villages and this was statistically significant. Another trial compared eye washing to no treatment or to topical tetracycline alone or to a combination of eye washing and tetracycline drops in children with follicular trachoma. The trial found no statistically significant benefit of eye washing alone or in combination with tetracycline eye drops in reducing follicular trachoma amongst children with follicular trachoma.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that face washing combined with topical tetracycline can be effective in reducing severe trachoma and in increasing the prevalence of clean faces. Current evidence does not however support a beneficial effect of face washing alone or in combination with topical tetracycline in reducing active trachoma.
沙眼仍是许多发展中国家贫困人群可避免失明的主要原因。据估计,约有1.46亿人患有活动性沙眼,近600万人因反复感染相关并发症而失明。
本综述的目的是评估洗脸对沙眼流行地区活动性沙眼患病率的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane图书馆(2004年第2期)中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,其中包含Cochrane眼科和视觉组试验注册库)、MEDLINE(1966年至2004年2月)、EMBASE(1980年至2004年2月)、已识别试验的参考文献列表以及科学引文索引。我们还联系了该领域的研究人员和专家以识别其他试验。
我们纳入了随机或半随机对照试验,比较洗脸与不治疗,或洗脸联合抗生素与单独使用抗生素的效果。试验参与者为沙眼流行地区的常住居民。
两名综述作者独立提取数据并评估试验质量。我们联系了研究作者以获取更多信息。纳入了两项临床异质性试验,因此不适合进行荟萃分析。
本综述纳入了两项试验,共有2560名参与者的数据。在一项试验中的三对村庄里,比较了洗脸联合局部用四环素与单独使用局部用四环素的效果。该试验发现,与单独使用局部用四环素相比,洗脸联合局部用四环素在降低“重度”活动性沙眼方面具有统计学显著效果。在降低(“非重度”)活动性沙眼方面,干预村庄与对照村庄之间未观察到统计学显著差异。干预村庄中脸部清洁的患病率高于对照村庄,且具有统计学显著性。另一项试验比较了在滤泡性沙眼儿童中洗眼与不治疗、单独使用局部用四环素或洗眼与四环素滴眼液联合使用的效果。该试验发现,单独洗眼或洗眼与四环素滴眼液联合使用在降低滤泡性沙眼儿童的滤泡性沙眼方面没有统计学显著益处。
有一些证据表明,洗脸联合局部用四环素可有效降低重度沙眼并提高脸部清洁的患病率。然而,目前的证据不支持单独洗脸或洗脸联合局部用四环素在降低活动性沙眼方面具有有益效果。