Schroth R J, Hitchon C A, Uhanova J, Noreddin A, Taback S P, Moffatt M E K, Zacharias J M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(3):CD003775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003775.pub2.
Chronic renal failure patients are at particular risk of hepatitis B virus infection. Early studies have demonstrated that renal failure patients benefit from vaccination; however, not all studies have consistently shown benefit.
To determine the beneficial and harmful effects of hepatitis B vaccine and of a reinforced vaccination series in chronic renal failure patients.
We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Renal Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2002),PubMed/MEDLINE (1966 to July 2003), EMBASE (1985 to November 2003), Current Clinical Practice Guidelines (Canadian Immunization Guide and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Surveillance Manual), and Science Citation Index as well as journals, published abstracts, and reference lists of articles.
Randomised clinical trials comparing plasma vaccine with placebo, recombinant vaccine with placebo, recombinant vaccine with plasma vaccine, and a reinforced vaccination series (ie, more than three inoculations) with three inoculations of vaccine in chronic renal failure patients.
Primary outcome measures included incidence of patients developing hepatitis B virus antibodies and infections while secondary outcomes included adverse events, liver-related morbidity, and mortality. Random effects models were used and reported relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (RR and 95% CI).
We included seven randomised clinical trials. None of them had high quality. Plasma vaccine was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving hepatitis B antibodies (RR 23.0, 95% CI 14.39 to 36.76, 3 trials). We found no statistically significant difference between plasma vaccine or placebo regarding hepatitis B virus infections (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.24). We found no statistically significant differences between recombinant vaccine and plasma vaccine in achieving hepatitis B antibodies (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.53, 2 trials). Heterogeneity was significant and appeared to be attributable to the dose of vaccine. Two trials examined a reinforced recombinant vaccine strategy, which was not statistically more effective than three inoculations of recombinant vaccine regarding development of hepatitis B antibodies (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.16).
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Plasma derived vaccines are more effective than placebo in achieving hepatitis B antibodies, while no statistically significant difference was found between recombinant and plasma vaccines. No statistically significant difference of effectiveness was observed between a reinforced vaccination series versus routine vaccinations of three inoculations of recombinant vaccine.
慢性肾衰竭患者感染乙型肝炎病毒的风险尤其高。早期研究表明肾衰竭患者接种疫苗有益;然而,并非所有研究都一致显示出益处。
确定乙型肝炎疫苗及强化接种系列对慢性肾衰竭患者的有益和有害影响。
我们检索了Cochrane肝胆疾病组对照试验注册库、Cochrane肾脏组对照试验注册库、Cochrane图书馆(2002年第1期)中的Cochrane对照试验注册库、PubMed/MEDLINE(1966年至2003年7月)、EMBASE(1985年至2003年11月)、当前临床实践指南(《加拿大免疫指南》和《疫苗可预防疾病监测手册》)以及科学引文索引,以及期刊、发表的摘要和文章的参考文献列表。
比较血浆疫苗与安慰剂、重组疫苗与安慰剂、重组疫苗与血浆疫苗,以及慢性肾衰竭患者强化接种系列(即超过三次接种)与三次疫苗接种的随机临床试验。
主要结局指标包括产生乙型肝炎病毒抗体和感染的患者发生率,次要结局包括不良事件、肝脏相关发病率和死亡率。采用随机效应模型并报告相对风险和95%置信区间(RR和95%CI)。
我们纳入了七项随机临床试验。均非高质量研究。在产生乙型肝炎抗体方面,血浆疫苗显著比安慰剂更有效(RR 23.0,95%CI 14.39至36.76,3项试验)。我们发现血浆疫苗或安慰剂在乙型肝炎病毒感染方面无统计学显著差异(RR 0.50,95%CI 0.20至1.24)。在产生乙型肝炎抗体方面,我们发现重组疫苗和血浆疫苗之间无统计学显著差异(RR 0.65,95%CI 0.28至1.53,2项试验)。异质性显著,似乎归因于疫苗剂量。两项试验研究了强化重组疫苗策略,在产生乙型肝炎抗体方面,该策略在统计学上并不比三次接种重组疫苗更有效(RR 1.36,95%CI 0.85至2.16)。
在产生乙型肝炎抗体方面,血浆来源疫苗比安慰剂更有效,而重组疫苗和血浆疫苗之间未发现统计学显著差异。在强化接种系列与三次接种重组疫苗的常规接种之间,未观察到有效性的统计学显著差异。