Suppr超能文献

用于预防清洁手术后手术伤口感染的术前皮肤消毒剂。

Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.

作者信息

Edwards P S, Lipp A, Holmes A

机构信息

National Patient Safety Agency, 4-8 Maple Street, London, UK, W1T 5HD.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of elective surgery patients and 30% of patients receiving contaminated or dirty surgery are estimated to develop post-operative wound infections. The costs of surgical wound infection can be considerable in financial as well as social terms. Preoperative skin antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of post-operative wound infections by removing soil and transient organisms from the skin. Antiseptics are thought to be both toxic to bacteria and aid their mechanical removal. The effectiveness of preoperative skin preparation is thought to be dependent on both the antiseptic used and the method of application, however it is unclear whether preoperative skin antisepsis actually reduces post-operative wound infection and if so which antiseptic is most effective.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether preoperative skin antisepsis reduces post-operative surgical wound infection.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in April 2004. In addition we handsearched journals, conference proceedings and bibliographies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of preoperative skin antiseptics applied immediately prior to incision in clean surgery. There were no restrictions based on language, date or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality. Pooling was inappropriate and trials are discussed in a narrative review.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six eligible RCTs evaluating preoperative antiseptics. There was significant heterogeneity in the comparisons and the results could not be pooled. In one study, infection rates were significantly lower when skin was prepared using chlorhexidine compared with iodine. There was no evidence of a benefit in four trials associated with the use of iodophor impregnated drapes.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient research examining the effects of preoperative skin antiseptics to allow conclusions to be drawn regarding their effects on post-operative surgical wound infections. Further research is needed.

摘要

背景

据估计,约15%的择期手术患者以及30%接受污染或不洁手术的患者会发生术后伤口感染。手术伤口感染的成本在经济和社会方面都可能相当可观。术前进行皮肤消毒是为了通过去除皮肤上的污垢和暂住菌来降低术后伤口感染的风险。人们认为防腐剂对细菌有毒性,并有助于机械性去除细菌。术前皮肤准备的效果被认为取决于所使用的防腐剂和应用方法,然而,术前皮肤消毒是否真的能降低术后伤口感染,以及如果能降低,哪种防腐剂最有效尚不清楚。

目的

确定术前皮肤消毒是否能降低术后手术伤口感染。

检索策略

我们于2004年4月检索了Cochrane伤口组专业试验注册库和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库。此外,我们还手工检索了期刊、会议论文集和参考文献目录。

选择标准

评估在清洁手术中切口前立即使用术前皮肤防腐剂的随机对照试验。不基于语言、日期或出版状态进行限制。

数据收集与分析

三位评价者独立进行数据提取和研究质量评估。合并分析不合适,试验在叙述性综述中进行讨论。

主要结果

我们确定了六项评估术前防腐剂的合格随机对照试验。比较中存在显著异质性,结果无法合并。在一项研究中,与碘相比,使用氯己定进行皮肤准备时感染率显著降低。在四项与使用碘伏浸渍手术单相关的试验中,没有证据表明有获益。

评价者结论

关于术前皮肤防腐剂对术后手术伤口感染影响的研究不足,无法得出结论。需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验