Adab N, Tudur Smith C, Vinten J, Williamson P, Winterbottom J
Walton Centre for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L9 7LJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD004848. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004848.
The potential adverse effects of antiepileptic drug (AED) exposure in pregnancy have been well recognised but the relative risks of specific antiepileptic drug exposures remain poorly understood.
To assess the adverse effects of commonly used antiepileptic drugs on maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy in women with epilepsy. Comparison of outcomes following specific antiepileptic drug exposures in utero to unexposed pregnancies in the general population or women with epilepsy are described. The current manuscript reports the first phase of this review which focuses upon neurodevelopmental outcomes in children exposed to antiepileptic drugs in utero.
We searched MEDLINE, Pharmline, EMBASE, Reprotox and TERIS from 1966 to December 2003. Review articles and conference abstracts were also hand searched.
All randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts of children of pregnant women with and without epilepsy and case control studies (cases: developmental delay or impaired cognitive outcome, control: normal development) were included.
Methodological quality was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The wide variety of outcome measures and methodological approaches made meta-analysis difficult and a descriptive analysis of the results is presented.
PART A 1b - DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES: The majority of studies were of limited quality. There was little evidence about which specific drugs carry more risk than others to the development of children exposed in utero. The results between studies are conflicting and while most failed to find a significant detrimental outcome with in utero exposure to monotherapy with carbamazepine, phenytoin or phenobarbitone, this should be interpreted cautiously. There were very few studies of exposure to sodium valproate. Polytherapy exposure in utero was more commonly associated with poorer outcomes, as was exposure to any AEDs when analysis did not take into account type of AED. The latter may reflect the large proportion of children included in these studies who were in fact exposed to polytherapy.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: PART A 1b - DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES: Based on the best current available evidence it would seem advisable for women to continue medication during pregnancy using monotherapy at the lowest dose required to achieve seizure control. Polytherapy would seem best avoided where possible. More population based studies adequately powered to examine the effects of in utero exposure to specific monotherapies which are used in everyday practice are required.
妊娠期间接触抗癫痫药物(AED)的潜在不良影响已得到充分认识,但特定抗癫痫药物接触的相对风险仍知之甚少。
评估常用抗癫痫药物对癫痫女性妊娠期间母婴结局的不良影响。描述子宫内接触特定抗癫痫药物后的结局与普通人群或癫痫女性未接触药物的妊娠结局的比较。本手稿报告了该综述的第一阶段,重点关注子宫内接触抗癫痫药物的儿童的神经发育结局。
我们检索了1966年至2003年12月的MEDLINE、Pharmline、EMBASE、Reprotox和TERIS。还手工检索了综述文章和会议摘要。
纳入所有随机对照试验、有癫痫和无癫痫孕妇子女的前瞻性队列研究以及病例对照研究(病例:发育迟缓或认知结局受损,对照:发育正常)。
使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表的改编版评估方法学质量。结局测量和方法学方法种类繁多,难以进行荟萃分析,因此对结果进行了描述性分析。
A部分1b - 发育结局:大多数研究质量有限。几乎没有证据表明哪种特定药物比其他药物对子宫内接触药物的儿童发育风险更大。研究结果相互矛盾,虽然大多数研究未发现子宫内接触卡马西平、苯妥英或苯巴比妥单药治疗有显著不良结局,但对此应谨慎解读。关于接触丙戊酸钠的研究很少。子宫内多药联合治疗更常与较差的结局相关,不考虑抗癫痫药物类型进行分析时,接触任何抗癫痫药物也是如此。后者可能反映了这些研究中纳入的儿童实际上接触多药联合治疗的比例很大。
A部分1b - 发育结局:根据目前可得的最佳证据,女性在妊娠期间似乎应以控制癫痫发作所需的最低剂量使用单药治疗继续用药。应尽可能避免多药联合治疗。需要更多基于人群的研究,其样本量足以检验子宫内接触日常实践中使用的特定单药治疗的影响。