Irvine Jamie, Chong Su L, Amirjani Nasim, Chan K Ming
Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Muscle Nerve. 2004 Aug;30(2):182-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.20095.
Several studies have suggested that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is effective in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In a double-blind randomized controlled trial of LLLT, 15 CTS patients, 34 to 67 years of age, were randomly assigned to either the control group (n = 8) or treatment group (n =7). Both groups were treated three times per week for 5 weeks. Those in the treatment group received 860 nm galium/aluminum/arsenide laser at a dosage of 6 J/cm2 over the carpal tunnel, whereas those in the control group were treated with sham laser. The primary outcome measure was the Levine Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, and the secondary outcome measures were electrophysiological data and the Purdue pegboard test. All patients completed the study without adverse effects. There was a significant symptomatic improvement in both the control (P = 0.034) and treatment (P =0.043) groups. However, there was no significant difference in any of the outcome measures between the two groups. Thus, LLLT is no more effective in the reduction of symptoms of CTS than is sham treatment.
多项研究表明,低强度激光疗法(LLLT)对腕管综合征(CTS)患者有效。在一项关于LLLT的双盲随机对照试验中,15名年龄在34至67岁的CTS患者被随机分为对照组(n = 8)或治疗组(n = 7)。两组均每周接受三次治疗,持续5周。治疗组患者在腕管上方接受波长为860 nm的镓/铝/砷化物激光治疗,剂量为6 J/cm2,而对照组则接受假激光治疗。主要结局指标是莱文腕管综合征问卷,次要结局指标是电生理数据和普渡钉板测试。所有患者均完成了研究,且未出现不良反应。对照组(P = 0.034)和治疗组(P = 0.043)的症状均有显著改善。然而,两组之间的任何结局指标均无显著差异。因此,LLLT在减轻CTS症状方面并不比假治疗更有效。