Toda Katsuhiro, Hiroshi Muneshige, Asou Tomohiro, Kimura Hiroaki
Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2004 Mar;53(1):1-5.
The current perception threshold (CPT) test has been developed as one of the neuroselective sensory nerve conduction threshold tests. The score of the CPT of the affected side subtracted from the score of the CPT of the unaffected side in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is expected to show pain objectively. The purpose of this study is to examine first whether the CPT of the affected side is generally lower than that of the unaffected side, and second, whether the greater score shows the more intense pain. The CPT of each side in 25 patients with unilateral CRPS type I was measured and compared. For the 2000 Hz stimulus, the CPT of the affected side was 2677 +/- 262 microAmp (mean +/- standard error) and the CPT of the unaffected side was 2194 +/- 247 microAmp (p = 0.0149). For the 250 Hz stimulus, the CPT was 876 +/- 117 microAmp and 721 +/- 73 microAmp respectively (p > 0.05). For the 5 Hz stimulus, the CPT was 730 +/- 105 microAmp and 448 +/- 56 microAmp respectively (p = 0.0018). In 2000 Hz, 250 Hz, and 5 Hz stimuli, the CPT of the affected side was higher than that of the unaffected side. This shows that generally the affected side is less sensitive than the unaffected side in terms of current perception. The score of the CPT of the affected side subtracted from the score of the CPT of the unaffected side in CRPS does not measure the patient's pain.
电流感觉阈值(CPT)测试已被开发为神经选择性感觉神经传导阈值测试之一。在复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)中,用患侧CPT得分减去未患侧CPT得分,预期可客观显示疼痛情况。本研究的目的,一是检查患侧的CPT是否通常低于未患侧,二是检查得分越高是否表明疼痛越剧烈。对25例单侧I型CRPS患者双侧的CPT进行了测量和比较。对于2000Hz刺激,患侧的CPT为2677±262微安(平均值±标准误差),未患侧为2194±247微安(p = 0.0149)。对于250Hz刺激,CPT分别为876±117微安和721±73微安(p>0.05)。对于5Hz刺激,CPT分别为730±105微安和448±56微安(p = 0.0018)。在2000Hz、250Hz和5Hz刺激下,患侧的CPT高于未患侧。这表明,一般而言,在电流感觉方面患侧比未患侧更不敏感。在CRPS中,用未患侧CPT得分减去患侧CPT得分并不能衡量患者的疼痛程度。