Renaudo Adrien, Watry Vanina, Chassot Anne-Amandine, Ponzio Gilles, Ehrenfeld Jordi, Soriani Olivier
UNSA Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 6078, Laboratoire de Physiologie des Membranes Cellulaires, Bāt. Jean Maetz, La Darse, 284, Chemin du Lazaret, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Dec;311(3):1105-14. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.072413. Epub 2004 Jul 26.
Previous studies have shown that sigma receptors are overexpressed in tumor cells. However, the role of sigma receptors remains enigmatic. Recently, we and others have demonstrated that sigma-1 receptor modulates K+ channels in pituitary. In the present report, patch-clamp and Western blot assays were used in small cell lung cancer (SCLC, NCI-H209, and NCI-H146) and leukemic (Jurkat) cell lines to investigate the effects of sigma ligands on voltage-gated K+ channels and cell proliferation. The sigma ligands (+)-pentazocine, igmesine, and 1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine (DTG) all reversibly inhibited voltage-activated K+ currents in both cell lines. The potency of sigma ligand-induced inhibition (10 microM) was igmesine = (+)-pentazocine > DTG, pointing to the involvement of sigma-1 receptors. Addition of the K+ channel blockers tetraethylammonium (TEA) and 4-aminopyridin or one of cited sigma ligands in the culture media reversibly inhibited Jurkat cell growth. Interestingly, K+ channel blockers and sigma ligands caused an accumulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1 and a decrease in cyclin A expression in Jurkat and SCLC cells, whereas no effect could be detected on p21cip1. Moreover, sigma ligands and TEA had no effect on caspase 3 activity. Accordingly, incubation of cells with sigma ligands did not provoke DNA laddering. These data demonstrate that sigma ligands and voltage-dependent channel blockers inhibit cell growth through a cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase but not via an apoptotic mechanism. Altogether, these results indicate that the sigma-1 receptor-induced inhibition of the cell cycle is, at least in part, the consequence of the inhibition of K+ channels.
先前的研究表明,σ受体在肿瘤细胞中过表达。然而,σ受体的作用仍然是个谜。最近,我们和其他人已经证明,σ-1受体调节垂体中的钾通道。在本报告中,采用膜片钳和蛋白质免疫印迹分析方法,对小细胞肺癌(SCLC,NCI-H209和NCI-H146)和白血病(Jurkat)细胞系进行研究,以探讨σ配体对电压门控钾通道和细胞增殖的影响。σ配体(+)-喷他佐辛、伊格美新和1,3-二(2-甲苯基)胍(DTG)均可可逆地抑制两种细胞系中的电压激活钾电流。σ配体诱导抑制(10μM)的效力为伊格美新=(+)-喷他佐辛>DTG,表明σ-1受体参与其中。在培养基中添加钾通道阻滞剂四乙铵(TEA)和4-氨基吡啶或上述σ配体之一可可逆地抑制Jurkat细胞生长。有趣的是,钾通道阻滞剂和σ配体导致Jurkat和SCLC细胞中细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂p27kip1积累,细胞周期蛋白A表达降低,而对p21cip1没有影响。此外,σ配体和TEA对caspase 3活性没有影响。因此,用σ配体孵育细胞不会引发DNA梯状条带形成。这些数据表明,σ配体和电压依赖性通道阻滞剂通过使细胞周期停滞在G1期而非通过凋亡机制来抑制细胞生长。总之,这些结果表明,σ-1受体诱导的细胞周期抑制至少部分是抑制钾通道的结果。