Becker Anne E, Franko Debra L, Nussbaum Karin, Herzog David B
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2004 Sep;36(2):157-62. doi: 10.1002/eat.20023.
The first National Eating Disorders Screening Program (NEDSP), conducted on more than 400 college campuses in 1996, was an educational and two-stage screening program designed to detect potentially clinically significant disordered eating attitudes and behaviors and offer referrals for further evaluation when warranted. The current study assessed the impact of the NEDSP on participants.
A randomly selected subset of this sample (n = 289) was contacted approximately 2 years after the NEDSP to assess the impact of the program on knowledge and treatment-seeking behaviors for eating disorders.
For greater than 80% of the participants, the program made participants aware of the danger of eating disorders and the availability of treatment. Of those who received a recommendation for further clinical evaluation of disordered eating (n = 109), nearly one half (47.7%) followed up on this recommendation and kept at least a first appointment and 39.4% actually sought treatment subsequent to the NEDSP.
The results of the current study suggest that educational and screening programs may be a promising strategy for secondary prevention of eating disorders. They also suggest that awareness of the risks of disordered eating and available treatment may not be sufficient to motivate individuals to adhere to recommendations to seek treatment. Clinicians should, therefore, be vigilant for nonadherence to treatment recommendations and proactive in facilitating treatment.
1996年在400多所大学校园开展的首个全国饮食失调筛查项目(NEDSP),是一项教育及两阶段筛查项目,旨在检测可能具有临床意义的饮食失调态度和行为,并在必要时提供进一步评估的转诊建议。本研究评估了NEDSP对参与者的影响。
在NEDSP开展约2年后,联系了该样本中随机抽取的一个子集(n = 289),以评估该项目对饮食失调知识及寻求治疗行为的影响。
超过80%的参与者表示,该项目让他们意识到了饮食失调的危害以及治疗的可获得性。在那些收到饮食失调进一步临床评估建议的参与者中(n = 109),近一半(47.7%)遵循了这一建议,至少进行了首次预约,并且39.4%的人在NEDSP之后实际寻求了治疗。
本研究结果表明,教育和筛查项目可能是饮食失调二级预防的一种有前景的策略。这些结果还表明,意识到饮食失调风险和可获得的治疗可能不足以促使个体遵循寻求治疗的建议。因此,临床医生应警惕不遵循治疗建议的情况,并积极推动治疗。