Jones Mavis, Salter Brian
Nursing and Midwifery Research Unit, Yorkon Building, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
New Genet Soc. 2003 Apr;22(1):21-41. doi: 10.1080/1463677032000069691.
The collection of practices now commonly understood as 'biotechnology' poses a challenge to traditional mechanisms of regulating science and technology, just as it challenges traditional practices of science. The task of regulation is to reconcile the often conflicting political demands of protecting science, economy and the public interest. Public trust is the key measure of political success or failure. The purpose of this paper is to use policy discourse analysis as a vehicle for exploring the politics of the relationship between human genetics governance and public trust. An analysis of 30 policy documents produced six identifiable discourse streams relevant to public trust. These findings will be discussed, and an analysis of their impact on effective governance presented in conclusion.
目前通常被理解为“生物技术”的一系列实践,对传统的科技监管机制构成了挑战,就如同它对传统科学实践构成挑战一样。监管的任务是协调保护科学、经济和公共利益等往往相互冲突的政治需求。公众信任是衡量政治成败的关键指标。本文的目的是将政策话语分析作为一种手段,用以探究人类基因治理与公众信任之间关系的政治因素。对30份政策文件的分析产生了与公众信任相关的六个可识别的话语流。将对这些发现进行讨论,并在结论中分析它们对有效治理的影响。