Quantitative computer-aided computed tomography analysis of sphenoid sinus anatomical relationships.

BACKGROUND

This study describes a novel computer-generated anatomic symmetry plane as a framework for the quantitative description of sphenoid sinus anatomy. The aim of this study was to (1) determine relationships and distances between a midline sphenoid reference point (called the central sphenoid point [CSP]) and lateral sphenoid wall structures and (2) assess the incidence of anterior clinoid process (ACP) pneumatization and pterygoid recess (PR) pneumatization.

METHODS

Axial computed tomography (CT) scans (1-mm slice thickness) were obtained on a VolumeZoom CT scanner (Siemens Medical, Erlangen, Germany). Mathematically derived anatomic symmetry planes were created using custom postprocessing software. A standardized review of each CT scan using surgical planning software (CBYON Suite version 2.6; CBYON, Mountain View, CA) was performed. The CSP was defined as a reference point in the midline sagittal plane at the intersection of the vertical sellar face and the horizontal sellar floor.

RESULTS

A total of 128 sides in 64 cadaveric specimens were available for review. The incidences of ACP pneumatization and PR pneumatization were 23.4 and 37.5%. The mean distances from the CSP to the left optic canal midpoint, the left ACP entrance point, and the left PR lateral wall were 17.2, 15.6, and 27.6 mm, respectively. The corresponding distances from the CSP on the right side were 17.3, 15.8, and 28.0 mm, respectively. Measurements from the maxillary spine to the optic canal midpoint, ACP entrance point, and PR lateral wall on each side were performed also.

CONCLUSION

This approach provides both quantitative and qualitative understanding of sphenoid osteology and may be coupled with intraoperative surgical navigation to reduce the risks of sphenoid surgery. Both PR and ACP pneumatization are surprisingly common. Because the CSP-derived relationships may be referenced during endoscopic surgical navigation, they may provide greater clinical utility than traditional alternatives. This paradigm may facilitate a greater understanding of sphenoid anatomy and enhance surgical safety and precision.