Suppr超能文献

手术在卵巢癌中的作用:最新进展

Role of surgery in ovarian cancer: an update.

作者信息

Vergote I

机构信息

University Hospitals Leuven, Dept. Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Chir Belg. 2004 Jun;104(3):246-56. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679550.

Abstract

Rupture of an ovarian malignant tumor should be avoided at the time of surgery for an early ovarian cancer. Laparoscopic removal of ovarian cysts should be restricted to patients with preoperative evidence that the cyst is benign. Degree of differentiation is the most important independent prognostic factor in stage I disease and should be used in decisions on therapy in clinical practice and the future FIGO-classification of Stage I. In early ovarian cancer staging adequacy and tumor grade were the only 2 statistical significant prognostic factors for survival in the multivariate analysis of the EORTC ACTION-trial. According to the present data there is no scientific basis to rely only on adjuvant chemotherapy or on optimal staging procedure in medium and high risk stage I ovarian cancer. Primary debulking surgery by a gynecologic oncologist remains the standard of care in advanced ovarian cancer. Optimal debulking surgery should be defined as no residual tumor load. Interval debulking is defined as an operation performed after a short course of induction chemotherapy, usually 2 or 3 cycles. Based on the randomized EORTC-GCG trial, interval debulking by an experienced surgeon improves survival in some patients who did not undergo optimal primary debulking surgery. Based on the GOG 152 data, interval debulking surgery does not seem to be indicated in patients who underwent primarily a maximal surgical effort by a gynecological oncologist. Open laparoscopy is probably the most valuable tool for evaluating the operability primarily or at the time of interval debulking surgery. In retrospective analyses neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery does not seem to worsen prognosis compared to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. However, we will have to wait for the results of the EORTC-GCG/NCI Canada randomized trial to know whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is as good as primary debulking surgery in some or all stage IIIc and IV patients. The most suitable candidates for secondary debulking surgery are those who had an initial complete response to chemotherapy, a long treatment-free interval (e.g. more than 12 months), and resectable disease (without diffuse carcinomatosis).

摘要

早期卵巢癌手术时应避免卵巢恶性肿瘤破裂。腹腔镜下卵巢囊肿切除术应仅限于术前有证据表明囊肿为良性的患者。分化程度是Ⅰ期疾病最重要的独立预后因素,应在临床实践中的治疗决策以及未来Ⅰ期的FIGO分类中加以应用。在欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)ACTION试验的多因素分析中,早期卵巢癌分期的充分性和肿瘤分级是生存的仅有的两个具有统计学意义的预后因素。根据目前的数据,在中高危Ⅰ期卵巢癌中,仅依靠辅助化疗或最佳分期程序没有科学依据。由妇科肿瘤学家进行的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术仍是晚期卵巢癌的标准治疗方法。最佳肿瘤细胞减灭术应定义为无残留肿瘤负荷。间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术定义为在短程诱导化疗(通常为2或3个周期)后进行的手术。基于EORTC-GCG随机试验,由经验丰富的外科医生进行间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术可提高部分未接受最佳初次肿瘤细胞减灭术患者的生存率。基于GOG 152的数据,对于那些主要由妇科肿瘤学家进行了最大程度手术治疗的患者,似乎不需要进行间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术。开放腹腔镜检查可能是评估初次或间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术可操作性的最有价值的工具。在回顾性分析中,与初次肿瘤细胞减灭术加化疗相比,新辅助化疗后行间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术似乎并未使预后恶化。然而,我们必须等待EORTC-GCG/加拿大国立癌症研究所随机试验的结果,以了解新辅助化疗后行间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术在部分或所有Ⅲc期和Ⅳ期患者中是否与初次肿瘤细胞减灭术效果相同。二次肿瘤细胞减灭术最合适的候选者是那些对化疗初始完全缓解、无瘤间期长(如超过12个月)且疾病可切除(无弥漫性癌转移)的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验