Hodde Naomi M, Engelberg Ruth A, Treece Patsy D, Steinberg Kenneth P, Curtis J Randall
Harborview Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug;32(8):1648-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000133018.60866.5f.
To determine the feasibility of using nurse ratings of quality of dying and death to assess quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit and to determine factors associated with nurse assessment of the quality of dying and death for patients dying in the intensive care unit.
Prospective cohort study.
Hospital intensive care unit.
178 patients who died in an intensive care unit during a 10-month period at one hospital.
Nurses completed a 14-item questionnaire measuring the quality of dying and death in the intensive care unit (QODD); standardized chart reviews were also completed.
Five variables were found to be associated with QODD scores. Higher (better) scores were significantly associated with having someone present at the time of death (p <.001), having life support withdrawn (p =.006), having an acute diagnosis such as intracranial hemorrhage or trauma (p =.007), not having cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the last 8 hrs of life (p <.001), and being cared for by the neurosurgery or neurology services (p =.002). Patient age, chronic disease, and Glasgow Coma Scale scores were not associated with the 14-item QODD. Using multivariate analyses, we identified three variables as independent predictors of the QODD score: a) not having cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed in the last 8 hrs of life; b) having someone present at the moment of death; and c) being cared for by neurosurgery or neurology services.
Intensive care unit nurse assessment of quality of dying and death is a feasible method for obtaining quality ratings. Based on nurse assessments, this study provides evidence of some potential targets for interventions to improve the quality of dying for some patients: having someone present at the moment of death and not having cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the last 8 hrs of life. If nurse-assessed quality of dying is to be a useful tool for measuring and improving quality of end-of-life care, it is important to understand the factors associated with nurse ratings.
确定使用护士对死亡质量的评分来评估重症监护病房临终关怀质量的可行性,并确定与护士对重症监护病房死亡患者死亡质量评估相关的因素。
前瞻性队列研究。
医院重症监护病房。
在一家医院10个月期间在重症监护病房死亡的178例患者。
护士完成一份14项问卷,测量重症监护病房的死亡质量(QODD);同时也完成标准化的病历审查。
发现五个变量与QODD评分相关。较高(较好)的分数与死亡时有他人在场(p<.001)、撤除生命支持(p =.006)、患有急性诊断疾病如颅内出血或创伤(p =.007)、在生命的最后8小时内未进行心肺复苏(p<.001)以及由神经外科或神经内科服务护理(p =.002)显著相关。患者年龄、慢性病和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与14项QODD无关。使用多变量分析,我们确定了三个变量作为QODD评分的独立预测因素:a)在生命的最后8小时内未进行心肺复苏;b)死亡时有他人在场;c)由神经外科或神经内科服务护理。
重症监护病房护士对死亡质量的评估是获得质量评分的可行方法。基于护士评估,本研究提供了一些改善部分患者死亡质量的潜在干预目标的证据:死亡时有他人在场以及在生命的最后8小时内未进行心肺复苏。如果护士评估的死亡质量要成为衡量和改善临终关怀质量的有用工具,了解与护士评分相关的因素很重要。