Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的手术感染:头孢曲松与头孢他啶抗生素预防。一项前瞻性研究。

Surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime antibiotic prophylaxis. A prospective study.

作者信息

Colizza Sergio, Rossi Stefano, Picardi Biagio, Carnuccio Pasquale, Pollicita Stefano, Rodio Francesco, Cucchiara Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Fatebenefratelli-Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Chir Ital. 2004 May-Jun;56(3):397-402.

Abstract

The incidence of surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported to be <2%, because of the minimal trauma due to this approach. We report the results of a prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime. From Jan 1 to Dec 31 2002 a consecutive series of 242 cholecystectomies were performed, consisting in 18 open cholecystectomies and 224 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 7 of which (3.1%) were converted to open cholecystectomies for technical and/or anatomical reasons. One hundred and eleven patients received 1 g i.v. ceftazidime 1 h before surgery, and 105 patients 1 g i.v. ceftriaxone on an alternate basis. Thirty-nine patients (17.4%) with acute cholecystitis received at least one booster dose at the end of the operation; 30 out of 39 were given further therapy for 2-3 days, i.e. 1 g i.v. bid. Twenty-two patients treated elsewhere with ceftriaxone or ceftazidime before surgery were transferred to another prophylactic regimen. The final diagnosis in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group was 219 bile stones, 3 adenomas, and 2 occult carcinomas. We had 4 complications (1.8% of 217 laparoscopic cholecystectomies), 2 of which were minor (infection of the umbilical access by S. aureus) and 2 major (1 biliary fistula [accessory duct] and 1 acute pancreatitis), both treated conservatively. Positive bile cultures (27 cases) were unrelated to the clinical course. The incidence of infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our prospective series was <2%. Ceftriaxone is confirmed as the gold standard in biliary tract surgery, but ceftazidime was equivalent (no statistical difference between the two antibiotics, P=0.59 NS). Ultra-short prophylaxis is enough in most cases, except in cholecystitis. We found no correlation between positive bile cultures and surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The umbilicus was the preferred site of infection in obese patients after the laparoscopic procedure. Major complications are usually related to technical pitfalls.

摘要

据报道,由于腹腔镜胆囊切除术创伤极小,其术后手术感染发生率<2%。我们报告了一项关于腹腔镜胆囊切除术中抗生素预防的前瞻性研究结果,比较头孢曲松与头孢他啶。2002年1月1日至12月31日,连续进行了242例胆囊切除术,其中18例为开腹胆囊切除术,224例为腹腔镜胆囊切除术,其中7例(3.1%)因技术和/或解剖原因转为开腹胆囊切除术。111例患者在手术前1小时静脉注射1g头孢他啶,105例患者交替静脉注射1g头孢曲松。39例(17.4%)急性胆囊炎患者在手术结束时至少接受了一次追加剂量;39例中有30例接受了2 - 3天的进一步治疗,即静脉注射1g,每日两次。22例术前在其他地方接受头孢曲松或头孢他啶治疗的患者被转为另一种预防方案。腹腔镜胆囊切除术组的最终诊断为219例胆结石、3例腺瘤和2例隐匿性癌。我们有4例并发症(217例腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的1.8%),其中2例为轻微并发症(金黄色葡萄球菌感染脐部切口),2例为严重并发症(1例胆瘘[副胆管]和1例急性胰腺炎),均采用保守治疗。胆汁培养阳性(27例)与临床病程无关。我们前瞻性系列研究中腹腔镜胆囊切除术后感染发生率<2%。头孢曲松被确认为胆道手术的金标准,但头孢他啶与之等效(两种抗生素之间无统计学差异,P = 0.59,无显著性差异)。除胆囊炎外,大多数情况下超短程预防就足够了。我们发现腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆汁培养阳性与手术感染之间无相关性。腹腔镜手术后,脐部是肥胖患者感染的首选部位。严重并发症通常与技术失误有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验