Appleton Jane V, Cowley Sarah
Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College, London, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Sep;41(7):785-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.03.006.
The aim of this paper is to examine health visitors' use of formal guidelines in identifying health needs and prioritizing families requiring extra health visiting support. With the increasing emphasis on targeted health visiting, a case study was used to explore the extent to which health visitors in three case sites use needs assessment guidelines in the assessment of family health need. The findings indicate how the presence of core visiting protocols hints at elements of control by managers, leading to conflicts in the relationship between professional judgements and official guidelines. Despite a management ethos of guideline formulation, several contradictions exist for which these guidelines are a focus. These include: little involvement of health visitors in guideline development, some staff not informed about the existence of formal guidelines, little evidence of guidelines contributing to improved client outcomes and their limited use by many health visitors in practice. Thus, even when guidelines exist, no accurate predictions can be made about health visitors' knowledge of or use of such guidelines in practice.
本文旨在探讨健康访视员在确定健康需求以及对需要额外健康访视支持的家庭进行优先级排序时对正式指南的使用情况。随着对有针对性的健康访视的日益重视,我们采用了一个案例研究来探究三个案例地点的健康访视员在评估家庭健康需求时使用需求评估指南的程度。研究结果表明,核心访视规程的存在暗示了管理者的控制因素,这导致了专业判断与官方指南之间关系的冲突。尽管存在制定指南的管理理念,但仍存在一些以这些指南为焦点的矛盾。这些矛盾包括:健康访视员很少参与指南制定,一些工作人员未被告知正式指南的存在,几乎没有证据表明指南有助于改善客户结果,以及许多健康访视员在实践中对其使用有限。因此,即使存在指南,也无法准确预测健康访视员在实践中对这些指南的了解或使用情况。