Apkon M, Leonard J, Probst L, DeLizio L, Vitale R
333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8064, USA.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):265-71. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.265.
A set of standard processes was developed for delivering continuous drug infusions in order to improve (1) patient safety; (2) efficiency in staff workflow; (3) hemodynamic stability during infusion changes, and (4) efficient use of resources. Failure modes effects analysis (FMEA) was used to examine the impact of process changes on the reliability of delivering drug infusions.
An 11 bed multidisciplinary pediatric ICU in the children's hospital of an academic medical center staffed by board certified pediatric intensivists. The hospital uses computerized physician order entry for all medication orders.
A multidisciplinary team characterized key elements of the drug infusion process. The process was enhanced to increase overall reliability and the original and revised processes were compared using FMEA. Resource consumption was estimated by reviewing purchasing and pharmacy records for the calendar year after full implementation of the revised process. Staff satisfaction was evaluated using an anonymous questionnaire administered to staff nurses in the ICU and pediatric residents who had rotated through the ICU.
The original process was characterized by six elements: selecting the drug; selecting a dose; selecting an infusion rate; calculating and ordering the infusion; preparing the infusion; programming the infusion pump and delivering the infusion. The following practice changes were introduced: standardizing formulations for all infusions; developing database driven calculators; extending infusion hang times from 24 to 72 hours; changing from bedside preparation by nurses to pharmacy prepared or premanufactured solutions. FMEA showed that the last three elements of the original process had high risk priority numbers (RPNs) of >225 whereas the revised process had no elements with RPNs >100. The combined effect of prolonging infusion hang times, preparation in the pharmacy, and purchasing premanufactured solutions resulted in 1500 fewer infusions prepared by nurses per year. Nursing staff expressed a significant preference and pediatric residents unanimously expressed a strong preference for the revised process.
Standardization of infusion delivery reduced the frequency for completing the most unreliable elements of the process and reduced the riskiness of the individual elements. Both contribute to a safer system.
制定一套用于持续药物输注的标准流程,以提高(1)患者安全;(2)工作人员工作流程的效率;(3)输注更换期间的血流动力学稳定性;以及(4)资源的有效利用。失效模式影响分析(FMEA)用于检查流程变更对药物输注可靠性的影响。
一家学术医疗中心的儿童医院内有一个拥有11张床位的多学科儿科重症监护病房,由获得董事会认证的儿科重症监护医生负责。该医院对所有药物医嘱采用计算机化医生医嘱录入系统。
一个多学科团队确定了药物输注流程的关键要素。对该流程进行改进以提高整体可靠性,并使用FMEA比较原始流程和修订后的流程。通过审查修订流程全面实施后日历年的采购和药房记录来估计资源消耗。使用对重症监护病房的护士和轮转至该重症监护病房的儿科住院医师进行的匿名调查问卷来评估工作人员满意度。
原始流程有六个要素:选择药物;选择剂量;选择输注速率;计算并开出输注医嘱;准备输注;设置输液泵并进行输注。引入了以下实践变更:使所有输注的制剂标准化;开发数据库驱动的计算器;将输注悬挂时间从24小时延长至72小时;从护士在床边准备改为药房准备或预制溶液。FMEA显示,原始流程的最后三个要素具有大于225的高风险优先数(RPN),而修订后的流程没有RPN大于100的要素。延长输注悬挂时间、在药房准备以及购买预制溶液的综合效果是,护士每年准备的输注次数减少了1500次。护理人员表示出明显的偏好,儿科住院医师一致对修订后的流程表示强烈偏好。
输注流程的标准化降低了完成该流程中最不可靠要素的频率,并降低了各个要素的风险。两者都有助于建立一个更安全的系统。