Buttner Mark P, Cruz Patricia, Stetzenbach Linda D, Klima-Comba Amy K, Stevens Vanessa L, Cronin Tracy D
Harry Reid Center for Environmental Studies, University of Nevada -- Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas, NV 89154-4009, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Aug;70(8):4740-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4740-4747.2004.
The efficacy of currently available decontamination strategies for the treatment of indoor furnishings contaminated with bioterrorism agents is poorly understood. Efficacy testing of decontamination products in a controlled environment is needed to ensure that effective methods are used to decontaminate domestic and workplace settings. An experimental room supplied with materials used in office furnishings (i.e., wood laminate, painted metal, and vinyl tile) was used with controlled dry aerosol releases of endospores of Bacillus atrophaeus ("Bacillus subtilis subsp. niger," also referred to as BG), a Bacillus anthracis surrogate. Studies were performed using two test products, a foam decontaminant and chlorine dioxide gas. Surface samples were collected pre- and posttreatment with three sampling methods and analyzed by culture and quantitative PCR (QPCR). Additional aerosol releases with environmental background present on the surface materials were also conducted to determine if there was any interference with decontamination or sample analysis. Culture results indicated that 10(5) to 10(6) CFU per sample were present on surfaces before decontamination. After decontamination with the foam, no culturable B. atrophaeus spores were detected. After decontamination with chlorine dioxide gas, no culturable B. atrophaeus was detected in 24 of 27 samples (89%). However, QPCR analysis showed that B. atrophaeus DNA was still present after decontamination with both methods. Environmental background material had no apparent effect on decontamination, but inhibition of the QPCR assay was observed. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of two decontamination methods and illustrate the utility of surface sampling and QPCR analysis for the evaluation of decontamination strategies.
目前可用的针对被生物恐怖主义制剂污染的室内家具的去污策略的效果尚不清楚。需要在受控环境中对去污产品进行效果测试,以确保采用有效的方法对家庭和工作场所进行去污。使用一个配备办公室家具所用材料(即木质层压板、涂漆金属和乙烯基地板)的实验室,对萎缩芽孢杆菌(“枯草芽孢杆菌黑色亚种”,也称为BG)的芽孢进行受控干气溶胶释放,萎缩芽孢杆菌是炭疽芽孢杆菌的替代物。使用两种测试产品进行了研究,一种是泡沫去污剂,另一种是二氧化氯气体。在处理前后,用三种采样方法采集表面样本,并通过培养和定量PCR(QPCR)进行分析。还对表面材料存在环境背景的情况下进行了额外的气溶胶释放,以确定是否对去污或样本分析有任何干扰。培养结果表明,去污前表面每个样本存在10(5)至10(6) CFU。用泡沫去污后,未检测到可培养的萎缩芽孢杆菌孢子。用二氧化氯气体去污后,27个样本中的24个(89%)未检测到可培养的萎缩芽孢杆菌。然而,QPCR分析表明,两种方法去污后仍存在萎缩芽孢杆菌DNA。环境背景材料对去污没有明显影响,但观察到QPCR测定受到抑制。这些结果证明了两种去污方法的有效性,并说明了表面采样和QPCR分析在评估去污策略中的实用性。