Smith Kenneth D, von Seggern David, Blewitt Geoffrey, Preston Leiph, Anderson John G, Wernicke Brian P, Davis James L
Nevada Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Science. 2004 Aug 27;305(5688):1277-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1101304. Epub 2004 Aug 5.
A deep earthquake swarm in late 2003 at Lake Tahoe, California (Richter magnitude < 2.2; depth of 29 to 33 kilometers), was coeval with a transient displacement of 6 millimeters horizontally outward from the swarm and 8 millimeters upward measured at global positioning system station Slide Mountain (SLID) 18 kilometers to the northeast. During the first 23 days of the swarm, hypocentral depths migrated at a rate of 2.4 millimeters per second up-dip along a 40-square-kilometer structure striking north 30 degrees west and dipping 50 degrees to the northeast. SLID's transient velocity of 20 millimeters per year implies a lower bound of 200 nanostrains per year (parts per billion per year) on local strain rates, an order of magnitude greater than the 1996 to 2003 regional rate. The geodetic displacement is too large to be explained by the elastic strain from the cumulative seismic moment of the sequence, suggesting an aseismic forcing mechanism. Aspects of the swarm and SLID displacements are consistent with lower-crustal magma injection under Lake Tahoe.
2003年末在加利福尼亚州太浩湖发生了一次深部地震群活动(里氏震级<2.2;震源深度29至33千米),与此同时,在东北方向18千米处的全球定位系统站点斯莱德山(SLID)测量到,该地震群引发了水平向外6毫米和向上8毫米的瞬时位移。在地震群活动的前23天里,震源深度沿着一个走向北偏西30度、倾角50度向东北的40平方千米的构造,以每秒2.4毫米的速度沿倾向向上迁移。SLID每年20毫米的瞬时速度意味着当地应变率每年下限为200纳应变(每年十亿分之一),比1996年至2003年的区域应变率大一个数量级。大地测量位移过大,无法用该地震序列累积地震矩产生的弹性应变来解释,这表明存在一种非地震强迫机制。地震群活动和SLID位移的一些方面与太浩湖下方下地壳岩浆注入的情况相符。