Ingyinn Ma, Rais-Bahrami Khodayar, Evangelista Rebecca, Hogan Inger, Rivera Oswaldo, Mikesell Gerald T, Short Billie L
Department of Neonatology, Children's National Medical Center and The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Perfusion. 2004 May;19(3):163-70. doi: 10.1191/0267659104pf736oa.
Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) using double lumen catheters is an alternative to venoarterial (VA) ECMO and allows for total blood flow using the patient's cardiac output in comparison to partial blood flow provided during VA ECMO.
To compare the effects of VV versus VA ECMO on renal blood flow.
Prospective study.
Research laboratory in a hospital.
Newborn lambs 1-7 days of age (n = 15).
In anesthetized, ventilated lambs, femoral artery and vein were cannulated for monitoring and renal venous blood sampling. An ultrasonic flow probe was placed on the left renal artery for continuous renal blood flow measurements. Animals were randomly assigned to control (non-ECMO), VV ECMO and VA ECMO groups. After systemic heparinization, the animals were cannulated and studied at bypass flows of 120 mL/kg/min (partial bypass) for two hours in both ECMO groups and 200 mL/kg/min (full bypass) for an additional 30 min in the VA group. Changes in blood pressure and renal flow on ECMO and during ECMO bridge unclamping were recorded continuously. Plasma renin activity (PRA) levels were sequentially sampled.
Systemic blood pressure was not different in VV or VA ECMO at partial bypass flow. However, systemic blood pressure increased significantly at maximal bypass flow in the VA ECMO group. There was no change in renal flow in either VV or VA ECMO groups. PRA levels did not correlate with bypass flow change. During unclamping of the ECMO bridge, blood pressure and renal flow drop significantly in the VA group, but not in the VV group.
VV and VA ECMO at partial bypass flows had comparable effect on blood pressure, renal blood flow and PRA level in this short-term study. However, unclamping of the ECMO bridges did differentially affect blood pressure and renal blood flow between VV and VA groups. We speculate that this repeated acute change in long-run VA ECMO support may play a role in the persistent hypertension seen in some patients.
使用双腔导管的静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV ECMO)是静脉-动脉(VA)ECMO的一种替代方法,与VA ECMO期间提供的部分血流相比,它能够利用患者的心输出量实现全血流。
比较VV ECMO与VA ECMO对肾血流的影响。
前瞻性研究。
医院的研究实验室。
1至7日龄的新生羔羊(n = 15)。
在麻醉、通气的羔羊中,插入股动脉和静脉用于监测和肾静脉血采样。在左肾动脉上放置超声血流探头以连续测量肾血流。动物被随机分配到对照组(非ECMO)、VV ECMO组和VA ECMO组。全身肝素化后,对动物进行插管,并在两个ECMO组中以120 mL/kg/min的旁路流量(部分旁路)研究两小时,在VA组中以200 mL/kg/min的旁路流量(全旁路)再研究30分钟。连续记录ECMO期间及ECMO桥松开期间的血压和肾血流变化。依次采集血浆肾素活性(PRA)水平。
在部分旁路流量时,VV或VA ECMO的全身血压无差异。然而,VA ECMO组在最大旁路流量时全身血压显著升高。VV或VA ECMO组的肾血流均无变化。PRA水平与旁路流量变化无关。在ECMO桥松开期间,VA组的血压和肾血流显著下降,但VV组未出现这种情况。
在这项短期研究中,部分旁路流量时的VV和VA ECMO对血压、肾血流和PRA水平具有相似的影响。然而,ECMO桥的松开对VV组和VA组的血压和肾血流产生了不同的影响。我们推测,长期VA ECMO支持中的这种反复急性变化可能在一些患者出现的持续性高血压中起作用。