Yeni Yener N, Dong X Neil, Fyhrie David P, Les Clifford M
Bone and Joint Center, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14(3):303-10.
A strong positive correlation between the apparent ultimate strength and stiffness of bone tissue that can be expressed by a unified relationship has been observed for cortical bone in tension and low-density cancellous bone in compression. For practical purposes, the existence of a relationship between strength and stiffness is significant in that bone stiffness can be measured in vivo using non-invasive methods. It is generally accepted that bone strength is greater in compression than in tension whereas there is no substantial evidence that bone stiffness in compression is different from that in tension. This might suggest that compressive strength would relate to the stiffness, if at all, in a way that is different from tensile strength. In order to examine similarities and differences in the way strength is associated with stiffness between modes of loading and tissue type, we tested equine cortical bone and bovine cancellous bone in compression and examined these data together with previously reported data from compression testing of human cancellous bone as well as tensile testing of cortical bone from various sources. We have found for cortical bone that (i) the sensitivity of strength to stiffness is the same for tension and compression (p>0.75, ANCOVA), and (ii) the difference between the magnitudes of compressive and tensile strength for cortical bone is the result of an additive, rather than a multiplicative factor (52.1 MPa after adjusting to 1 microstrain/s, p<0.0001, ANOVA). High-density bovine tibial cancellous bone, on the other hand, has a steeper slope for its compressive strength-stiffness relationship than that for cortical bone and human cancellous bone, resulting in a transitional relationship between compressive strength and stiffness for a range of bone types and densities. Based on the current results and previous work, it is suggested that the offset strength in the compressive strength-stiffness relationship may be a direct manifestation of the difference between the compressive and tensile strengths of the bone material that constitutes the building blocks of the bone structure. Deviation of high-density cancellous bone compressive behavior from the other bone types and densities is attributed to stress distribution differences between the bone types.
对于皮质骨的拉伸以及低密度松质骨的压缩,已经观察到骨组织的表观极限强度与刚度之间存在强正相关,这种相关性可用一个统一的关系来表示。出于实际应用目的,强度与刚度之间存在关系这一点很重要,因为可以使用非侵入性方法在体内测量骨刚度。一般认为,骨在压缩时的强度大于拉伸时的强度,然而,没有实质性证据表明压缩时的骨刚度与拉伸时的骨刚度不同。这可能表明,如果压缩强度与刚度有关,其关联方式可能与拉伸强度不同。为了研究加载模式和组织类型之间强度与刚度关联方式的异同,我们对马的皮质骨和牛的松质骨进行了压缩测试,并将这些数据与先前报道的人类松质骨压缩测试数据以及来自各种来源的皮质骨拉伸测试数据一起进行了分析。我们发现,对于皮质骨,(i)拉伸和压缩时强度对刚度的敏感度相同(p>0.75,协方差分析),并且(ii)皮质骨压缩强度与拉伸强度大小之间的差异是由一个相加因素而非相乘因素导致的(调整为1微应变/秒后为52.1兆帕,p<0.0001,方差分析)。另一方面,高密度牛胫骨松质骨的抗压强度 - 刚度关系曲线斜率比皮质骨和人类松质骨更陡,这导致在一系列骨类型和密度范围内,抗压强度与刚度之间呈现出过渡关系。基于当前结果和先前的研究工作,有人提出抗压强度 - 刚度关系中的偏移强度可能是构成骨结构基本单元的骨材料抗压强度与抗拉强度差异的直接体现。高密度松质骨的压缩行为与其他骨类型和密度的偏差归因于不同骨类型之间的应力分布差异。