Coulombe R, Cygler M
Biotechnology Research Institute, NRC, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1997 Jul 1;53(Pt 4):426-33. doi: 10.1107/S0907444997000942.
Density-modification algorithms have gained, in recent years, a widespread use in the early stages of protein structure determination, especially in combination with the single isomorphous replacement, the multiple isomorphous replacement and the multiple-wavelength anomalous dispersion methods, where density modification usually leads to a significant improvement in the quality and interpretability of the initial electron-density map. The current computer programs which are used to perform this task combine several approaches, an important component of which is the solvent-flattening procedure. The latter procedure depends crucially on the correct determination of the molecular envelope. The solvent-flattening procedure has also been applied to the electron-density maps calculated from partial mod- els obtained from the molecular replacement method. In such case the envelope calculated in the standard way does not always encompass entirely the missing part. It has been found that the standard application of the density-modification method (as implemented by programs SQUASH and DM) to a map calculated from a molecular replacement model containing approximately 60% of the molecule, led to little improvement in the map interpretability. Here, it is shown that a significant improvement of the map can be achieved when a better envelope is used in the procedure. Various methods of calculating the molecular envelope have been evaluated, the effect of the shape of the envelope on the modified electron-density map has been investigated and an improved procedure to calculate the envelope from a partial molecular replacement model is proposed.
近年来,密度修正算法在蛋白质结构测定的早期阶段得到了广泛应用,特别是与单对映体置换、多对映体置换和多波长反常色散方法相结合时,密度修正通常会显著提高初始电子密度图的质量和可解释性。当前用于执行此任务的计算机程序结合了多种方法,其中一个重要组成部分是溶剂扁平化过程。后一过程关键取决于分子包络的正确确定。溶剂扁平化过程也已应用于从分子置换法获得的部分模型计算出的电子密度图。在这种情况下,以标准方式计算的包络并不总是完全包含缺失部分。已经发现,将密度修正方法(如程序SQUASH和DM所实现的)标准应用于从包含约60%分子的分子置换模型计算出的图时,图的可解释性几乎没有改善。在此表明,当在该过程中使用更好的包络时,可以实现图的显著改善。已经评估了计算分子包络的各种方法,研究了包络形状对修正后的电子密度图的影响,并提出了一种从部分分子置换模型计算包络的改进方法。