Sharp Andrew, Pichert Gabriella, Lucassen Anneke, Eccles Diana
Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP2 8BJ, UK.
Hum Mutat. 2004 Sep;24(3):272. doi: 10.1002/humu.9267.
The classical paradigm of mutation screening seeks to relate alterations in DNA sequence to their effect at the protein level. However, the majority of missense mutations are problematic as their pathological significance is often unclear. In order to test the hypothesis that many missense mutations primarily cause defects at the RNA rather than the protein level, we have performed retrospective RNA analysis of 12 individuals carrying missense mutations in the cancer predisposition genes APC, BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, and MSH2. RNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples and RT-PCR performed in order to assess the splicing and expression of the mutant allele in each case. Four of the 12 missense mutations analysed were associated with RNA defects. We detected two cases of exon skipping and one case of partial intron inclusion with activation of a cryptic intronic splice site in MLH1. A fourth case was associated with monoallelic expression of BRCA1. In addition, allele-specific analysis of common coding polymorphisms identified a further case of monoallelic BRCA1 expression in one of two individuals who had previously screened as mutation-negative. Although we were unable to identify the underlying cause of this loss of expression, it strongly suggests the presence of a pathogenic defect in BRCA1 in this case, highlighting the use of allelic expression studies as a method of mutation scanning. Finally, we used our dataset to test the ability of several in silico sequence analysis tools to identify splicing defects. Our results suggest that a significant number of missense mutations in cancer predisposition genes are associated with defects of RNA splicing, and that the use of gene- and splice site prediction software can aid in identifying such mutations.
经典的突变筛查范式试图将DNA序列的改变与其在蛋白质水平上的效应联系起来。然而,大多数错义突变存在问题,因为它们的病理意义往往不明确。为了验证许多错义突变主要在RNA而非蛋白质水平上导致缺陷这一假设,我们对12名携带癌症易感基因APC、BRCA1、BRCA2、MLH1和MSH2错义突变的个体进行了回顾性RNA分析。从外周血样本中提取RNA,并进行逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR),以评估每种情况下突变等位基因的剪接和表达。在分析的12个错义突变中,有4个与RNA缺陷相关。我们在MLH1中检测到2例外显子跳跃和1例部分内含子包含以及一个隐蔽内含子剪接位点的激活。第4例与BRCA1的单等位基因表达有关。此外,对常见编码多态性的等位基因特异性分析在两名之前筛查为突变阴性的个体中的一人中又发现了1例BRCA1单等位基因表达。尽管我们无法确定这种表达缺失的根本原因,但这强烈表明该病例中BRCA1存在致病缺陷,突出了等位基因表达研究作为一种突变扫描方法的应用。最后,我们利用我们的数据集测试了几种计算机序列分析工具识别剪接缺陷的能力。我们的结果表明,癌症易感基因中的大量错义突变与RNA剪接缺陷相关,并且使用基因和剪接位点预测软件有助于识别此类突变。