Simpson D, Keating J F
Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK.
Injury. 2004 Sep;35(9):913-8. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00109-8.
To compare the use of an injectable calcium phosphate cement (Skeletal Repair System (SRS), Norian corporation, Cupertino, CA) and minimal internal fixation with buttress plating and bone grafting for lateral tibial plateau fractures.
Retrospective analysis with 13 age, sex and fracture matched pairs of tibial plateau fractures.
Thirteen patients with lateral tibial plateau fractures treated with buttress plating and bone grafting were matched with 13 patients treated using minimal internal fixation and an injectable calcium phosphate cement (SRS). All patients were followed for a minimum of one year. The operative time, quality of reduction, maintenance of reduction and development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis was compared in both groups.
The mean duration of surgery was 101 min in patients treated with buttress plating and bone grafting and 55 min in patients treated with SRS (P < 0.0001). Nine patients in the internal fixation and bone graft group had excellent anatomical reductions as judged on post-operative radiographs but some loss of reduction was observed in 8 of the 13 (61%) cases. All 13 patients from the SRS group had an excellent reduction on post-operative radiographs but 3 (23%) demonstrated some loss of reduction of the plateau. The mean residual plateau depression at one year was 4mm in the buttress plate group and 0.7 mm in the SRS group (P < 0.005). Two patients (15%) in the buttress plate group developed post-traumatic osteoarthritis and required knee arthroplasty.
The use of SRS was associated with more favourable anatomical results than conventional treatment with buttress plating and bone grafting for lateral tibial plateau fractures.
比较可注射磷酸钙骨水泥(骨骼修复系统(SRS),诺瑞安公司,加利福尼亚州库比蒂诺)与使用支撑钢板内固定及植骨治疗胫骨外侧平台骨折的疗效。
对13对年龄、性别及骨折情况相匹配的胫骨平台骨折病例进行回顾性分析。
13例接受支撑钢板内固定及植骨治疗的胫骨外侧平台骨折患者与13例接受微创内固定及可注射磷酸钙骨水泥(SRS)治疗的患者进行匹配。所有患者均随访至少1年。比较两组患者的手术时间、复位质量、复位维持情况及创伤后骨关节炎的发生情况。
接受支撑钢板内固定及植骨治疗的患者平均手术时间为101分钟,而接受SRS治疗的患者为55分钟(P < 0.0001)。根据术后X线片判断,内固定及植骨组9例患者获得了良好的解剖复位,但13例患者中有8例(61%)出现了一定程度的复位丢失。SRS组13例患者术后X线片均显示复位良好,但有3例(23%)出现了平台复位丢失。支撑钢板组1年时平均残留平台塌陷为4mm,SRS组为0.7mm(P < 0.005)。支撑钢板组2例患者(15%)发生创伤后骨关节炎,需要进行膝关节置换术。
对于胫骨外侧平台骨折,与传统的支撑钢板内固定及植骨治疗相比,使用SRS可获得更优的解剖学结果。