Briesacher Becky, Kamal-Bahl Sachin, Hochberg Marc, Orwig Denise, Kahler Kristijan H
Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester 01605, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1679-84. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1679.
Previous studies of 3-tier formularies are rare, although the evidence suggests that their cost-sharing structure reduces overall drug spending. However, it is unclear how incentive-based formularies affect the selection of medications with safety advantages, or restrict the access that high-risk populations have to recommended therapies in the higher tiers. This study was designed to determine whether 3-tier formularies influence the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in a population of patients with arthritis.
This retrospective study used the 2000 MarketScan Research Database, which contains person-level claims data for employer-sponsored health plans. The sample for this study consisted of 20 868 individuals treated for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and using NSAIDs while enrolled in tiered drug plans (n = 32). The likelihood of any use of cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2)-selective inhibitors was determined as a function of tiered drug plan coverage, adjusting for other person-level and plan-level covariates.
Use of COX-2-selective inhibitors decreased (63.0% vs 53.6% vs 41.6%, respectively) and use of generic NSAIDs increased (37.7% vs 40.7% vs 55.7%, respectively) as formularies incorporated 1, 2, and 3 tiers. Enrollees in 3-tier plans with arthritis and serious gastrointestinal comorbidities (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.66) were significantly less likely to use COX-2-selective inhibitors compared with patients in 1-tier plans.
Three-tier formularies appear to reduce the use of COX-2-selective inhibitors among all patients with arthritis, even those at risk of experiencing gastrointestinal complications from using nonselective NSAIDs. These findings are among the first to suggest that tiered-copayment drug plans may be influencing the selection of medications beyond generic and branded products.
尽管有证据表明三层处方集的成本分担结构可降低总体药品支出,但此前关于三层处方集的研究较少。然而,基于激励机制的处方集如何影响具有安全性优势药物的选择,或者如何限制高危人群使用更高层级推荐疗法的机会,目前尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定三层处方集是否会影响关节炎患者群体中对非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的使用。
这项回顾性研究使用了2000年市场扫描研究数据库,该数据库包含雇主赞助健康计划的个人层面理赔数据。本研究的样本包括20868名接受骨关节炎或类风湿关节炎治疗且在分层药物计划(n = 32)中使用NSAIDs的个体。根据分层药物计划覆盖范围确定使用环氧化酶(COX-2)选择性抑制剂的可能性,并对其他个人层面和计划层面的协变量进行调整。
随着处方集纳入1层、2层和3层,COX-2选择性抑制剂的使用减少(分别为63.0%、53.6%和41.6%),而通用NSAIDs的使用增加(分别为37.7%、40.7%和55.7%)。与1层计划的患者相比,患有关节炎和严重胃肠道合并症的3层计划参保者使用COX-2选择性抑制剂的可能性显著降低(优势比,0.51;95%置信区间,0.40 - 0.66)。
三层处方集似乎会减少所有关节炎患者中COX-2选择性抑制剂的使用,即使是那些有因使用非选择性NSAIDs而出现胃肠道并发症风险的患者。这些发现首次表明,分层共付药物计划可能正在影响除通用和品牌产品之外的药物选择。