Peichl Petr, Kautzner Josef, Cihák Robert, Bytesník Jan
Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Aug;27(8):1105-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00592.x.
Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has clearly demonstrated its clinical benefit in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and intraventricular conduction abnormalities, selection of eligible patients and/or optimal pacing site are still a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to analyze the spectrum of conduction abnormalities in CRT candidates. A total of 26 patients (mean age 62 +/- 9 years) with CHF and conduction disturbances (QRS > or = 130 ms) were studied. The underlying heart disease was dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n = 12) or coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 14). High density, left ventricular endocardial activation maps were constructed using an electroanatomic mapping system (CARTO). Based on endocardial activation patterns, left ventricular conduction abnormalities were classified as left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n = 9), nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbances (n = 10), and the bifascicular block (n = 7). In DCM patients the endocardial activation sequences corresponded with a 12-lead ECG pattern with a homogeneous spread of activation wavefront and the latest activation laterally (LBBB) or anteriorly (bifascicular block), respectively. CAD patients presented with variable activation patterns that reflected the location of the postinfarct scar, and the 12-lead ECG was less predictive. Although there was a trend for longer QRS durations for DCM subjects (170 +/- 23 vs 156 +/- 23 ms, P = NS), left ventricular activation time was significantly longer in the CAD group (115 +/- 21 ms vs 134 +/- 23 ms, P < 0.05). CRT candidates represent a broad spectrum of conduction abnormality patterns with variable inter- and intraventricular activation delays. CAD subjects have more pronounced intraventricular conduction abnormality. The standard ECG is less reliable in the characterization of complex conduction abnormalities.
尽管心脏再同步治疗(CRT)已在充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和室内传导异常患者中明确显示出临床益处,但 eligible 患者的选择和/或最佳起搏部位仍存在争议。本研究的目的是分析 CRT 候选患者的传导异常谱。共研究了 26 例 CHF 和传导障碍(QRS≥130 ms)患者(平均年龄 62±9 岁)。潜在的心脏病为扩张型心肌病(DCM)(n = 12)或冠状动脉疾病(CAD)(n = 14)。使用电解剖标测系统(CARTO)构建高密度左心室心内膜激动图。根据心内膜激动模式,左心室传导异常分为左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)(n = 9)、非特异性室内传导障碍(n = 10)和双分支传导阻滞(n = 7)。在 DCM 患者中,心内膜激动序列分别与 12 导联心电图模式相对应,激动波前均匀扩散,最晚激动位于外侧(LBBB)或前方(双分支传导阻滞)。CAD 患者表现出可变的激动模式,反映了梗死后瘢痕的位置,12 导联心电图的预测性较差。尽管 DCM 受试者的 QRS 时限有延长趋势(170±23 与 156±23 ms,P = 无显著性差异),但 CAD 组的左心室激动时间明显更长(115±21 与 134±23 ms,P < 0.05)。CRT 候选患者代表了广泛的传导异常模式,并伴有可变的室内和室间激动延迟。CAD 受试者的室内传导异常更为明显。标准心电图在复杂传导异常的特征描述中可靠性较低。 (注:原文中“eligible”翻译为“符合条件的、合适的、合格的”等意思,这里根据语境翻译为“合适的”;“NS”翻译为“无显著性差异” )