Dixit Sanjay, Gerstenfeld Edward P, Callans David J, Marchlinski Francis E
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Aug;27(8):1120-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00594.x.
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is often initiated by pulmonary vein (PV) depolarizations. However, sustained PV firing (PVF) is infrequently observed in this population and has not been characterized. In 15 patients undergoing AF ablation we report the response of sustained PVF to pacing and pharmacological maneuvers. Sustained PVF was defined as discrete, repetitive, electrical activity during sinus rhythm that did not correspond with other electrical events (P, QRS, T wave), persisting > or =5 minutes and recorded at/or distal to PV ostium prior to ablation. During sustained PVF, pacing was performed from coronary sinus and/or posterior right atrium at different cycle lengths (900 to 400 ms; duration: 30 to 60 s) following which, if PVF persisted, in random order, isoproterenol and adenosine were administered and carotid sinus massage (CSM) was performed. PVF response was classified as: suppressed (complete quiescence), augmented (increase in frequency of PVF/AF initiation) and "no effect." Sustained PVF was observed in 16 veins. In 13 (81%) patients, PVF was suppressed during overdrive pacing with early recurrence (< or =5 s) postpacing regardless of pacing cycle length in 11 (85%) patients. PVF was augmented by isoproterenol in the majority of patients (88%) and showed mixed response to adenosine (augmented 40%, suppressed 20%, and no effect 40%). CSM appeared to have no effect on PVF in the majority of patients (86%). Sustained PVF is seen infrequently in patients undergoing AF ablation. Its response to pacing maneuvers argues against sustained reentry and supports triggered activity and/or abnormal automaticity as the mechanisms underlying the phenomenon.
心房颤动(AF)通常由肺静脉(PV)去极化引发。然而,在这一人群中很少观察到持续性肺静脉发放电活动(PVF),且其特征尚未明确。在15例接受房颤消融的患者中,我们报告了持续性PVF对起搏和药理学操作的反应。持续性PVF被定义为窦性心律期间离散、重复的电活动,与其他电活动事件(P波、QRS波、T波)无关,持续≥5分钟,且在消融前于肺静脉口处及/或其远端记录到。在持续性PVF期间,在不同周期长度(900至400毫秒;持续时间:30至60秒)下从冠状窦和/或右心房后壁进行起搏,之后,如果PVF持续存在,则随机顺序给予异丙肾上腺素和腺苷,并进行颈动脉窦按摩(CSM)。PVF反应分为:抑制(完全静止)、增强(PVF/房颤起始频率增加)和“无影响”。在16条静脉中观察到持续性PVF。在13例(81%)患者中,超速起搏期间PVF被抑制,11例(85%)患者起搏后早期复发(≤5秒),与起搏周期长度无关。大多数患者(88%)的PVF被异丙肾上腺素增强,对腺苷表现出混合反应(增强40%,抑制20%,无影响40%)。大多数患者(86%)中CSM似乎对PVF无影响。在接受房颤消融的患者中很少见到持续性PVF。其对起搏操作的反应反对持续性折返,并支持触发活动和/或异常自律性作为该现象的潜在机制。