Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂在心力衰竭中的药效学:来自卡维地洛或美托洛尔欧洲试验的经验教训。

Pharmacodynamics of beta-blockers in heart failure: lessons from the carvedilol or metoprolol European trial.

作者信息

Bauman Jerry L, Talbert Robert L

机构信息

Departments of Pharmacy Practice and Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jun;9(2):117-28. doi: 10.1177/107424840400900207.

Abstract

Heart failure is a growing public health problem in the United States, and the approach to the treatment of heart failure has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. The use of beta-blocker therapy in heart failure patients is now widely recommended, based on evidence from large-scale clinical trials demonstrating that bisoprolol, carvedilol, and extended-release metoprolol succinate significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Although these agents appear to provide similar benefits, the question remains whether pharmacologic differences among them could translate to differences in clinical outcomes. The Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) compared nonselective blockade of the beta1-/beta2-/alpha1-adrenergic receptors with carvedilol versus selective beta1-blockade with immediate-release metoprolol tartrate in patients with chronic heart failure. The trial found that carvedilol significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared with immediate-release metoprolol tartrate, although there were no differences in hospitalizations. Herein we review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metoprolol and carvedilol. In doing so, several issues regarding the design of COMET are identified that could alter the interpretation of the results of this trial. These include the choice of dose and dosage regimen of immediate-release metoprolol tartrate, a dosage form that has never been shown to reduce mortality in patients with heart failure. Additional studies are needed to fully understand whether there are any advantages of selective versus nonselective adrenergic blockade and whether there are any clinically meaningful differences in effectiveness between beta-blockers with proven benefit in the management of chronic heart failure. The results of COMET demonstrate that all beta-blockers and dosage forms are not interchangeable when prescribed for heart failure. Clinicians should choose only those agents (and dosage forms) that have been proven to reduce mortality in this patient population.

摘要

心力衰竭在美国是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,在过去十年中,心力衰竭的治疗方法发生了根本性的转变。基于大规模临床试验的证据,目前广泛推荐在心力衰竭患者中使用β受体阻滞剂治疗,这些证据表明比索洛尔、卡维地洛和琥珀酸美托洛尔缓释片可显著降低心力衰竭患者的发病率和死亡率。尽管这些药物似乎提供了相似的益处,但它们之间的药理学差异是否会转化为临床结果的差异,这一问题仍然存在。卡维地洛与美托洛尔欧洲试验(COMET)比较了在慢性心力衰竭患者中,使用卡维地洛非选择性阻断β1-/β2-/α1-肾上腺素能受体与使用酒石酸美托洛尔速释片选择性阻断β1-肾上腺素能受体的效果。该试验发现,与酒石酸美托洛尔速释片相比,卡维地洛显著降低了全因死亡率,尽管在住院率方面没有差异。在此,我们回顾了美托洛尔和卡维地洛的药代动力学和药效学。在此过程中,我们发现了一些关于COMET试验设计的问题,这些问题可能会改变对该试验结果的解释。这些问题包括酒石酸美托洛尔速释片的剂量和给药方案的选择,这种剂型从未被证明能降低心力衰竭患者的死亡率。需要进行更多的研究,以充分了解选择性与非选择性肾上腺素能受体阻断是否有任何优势,以及在慢性心力衰竭管理中已证实有益的β受体阻滞剂之间在有效性方面是否存在任何具有临床意义的差异。COMET试验的结果表明,在为心力衰竭患者开处方时,并非所有的β受体阻滞剂和剂型都是可互换的。临床医生应仅选择那些已被证明能降低该患者群体死亡率的药物(和剂型)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验