Ongkosuwito E M, Katsaros C, Bodegom J C, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M
Afdeling Orthodontie en Orale Biologie, Universitair Medisch Centrum Sint Radboud, Nijmegen.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2004 Jul;111(7):266-70.
There are different methods to produce digital head films and all have advantages and disadvantages. With a digital head film and a computer programme for digital cephalometry an analysis can be performed easily. All existing computer programmes for digital cephalometry use reference values to compare with the patient's values. However, the magnification factors of the two data sets, which are compared, must be known and correction to the same magnification must be possible within the programme. Furthermore, the reference values should be age, gender, and population related. Many commercially available programmes do not fulfil these criteria. A well-designed programme for digital cephalometry should have the possibility to calculate age and gender-related reference values based on values of the target population. Furthermore it should have the possibility to analyse several longitudinal head films at the same time and to present the data graphically. A national survey among Dutch orthodontists by the end of 2000 demonstrated that 35% of Dutch orthodontists used digital cephalometry in their office. The most commonly used analysis was the Steiner-Tweed analysis, which was performed by nearly 60% of the orthodontists.
有不同的方法来制作数字化头颅侧位片,且各有优缺点。借助数字化头颅侧位片和用于数字化头影测量的计算机程序,分析可以轻松进行。所有现有的数字化头影测量计算机程序都使用参考值与患者的值进行比较。然而,必须知道要比较的两个数据集的放大倍数,并且程序内必须能够将其校正为相同的放大倍数。此外,参考值应与年龄、性别和人群相关。许多商业可用程序不符合这些标准。一个设计良好的数字化头影测量程序应该能够根据目标人群的值计算与年龄和性别相关的参考值。此外,它应该能够同时分析多张纵向头颅侧位片,并以图形方式呈现数据。2000年底在荷兰正畸医生中进行的一项全国性调查表明,35%的荷兰正畸医生在其诊所使用数字化头影测量。最常用的分析方法是Steiner-Tweed分析,近60%的正畸医生使用该方法。