Du Toit D F, Saaiman J A, Labuschagne B C J, Vorster W, Van Beek F J, Boden B H, Geldenhuys K M
School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2004 Jul-Aug;15(4):170-7.
Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is an established alternative option to conventional surgery for AAA, provided optimal anatomical morphology of the aneurysm sac, neck and outflow exists. In most documented series of EVAR, type-II endoleak occurrence is a universal procedural drawback. This is referred to as the Achilles heel of EVAR. This morphological study, addressing predominantly non-aneurysmal aortic anatomy, reveals the dyssynchronous origins of the renal ostia, ectopia of the superior mesenteric artery and median sacral artery, variations in the length of the infrarenal abdominal aorta, multiple mainstem renal arteries, and the presence of accessory renal arteries (in 13% of cadavers). Such potential vascular anomalies need careful consideration pre-operatively prior to EVAR. In a prospective, clinical study of EVAR in 163 patients over 60 months, using four different aortic stent devices, we demonstrated an intraprocedural type-II endoleak rate, before exclusion, of 3% (5/163). Most were related to patent lumbar arteries. An active policy of intraprocedural aneurysm pressure sac measurement and angiography was used to demonstrate type-I and type-II endoleaks, focusing on the applied anatomy of aortic side branches and variations. Selective intraprocedural coil embolisation and thrombin injection into the sac was utilised to thrombose persisting and large lumbar arteries that predisposed to retroleaks. We recorded a low incidence of persisting type-II endoleaks using this proactive treatment strategy by addressing variant aortic morphology and patent lumbar arteries during EVAR. One aneurysm-related death (0.6%) was observed due to late rupture after EVAR, and a single intraprocedural death was related to unpredictable aneurysm rupture. In conclusion, comprehensive anatomical knowledge of the abdominal aorta and its main collateral side branches, including variations, is a fundamental prerequisite if satisfactory and predictable results are to be achieved after EVAR, especially regarding prevention, diagnosis and treatment of type-II endoleaks. Intraprocedural aneurysm sac pressure monitoring, coil embolisation and the use of injection of thrombin into the aneurysm sac of selected patients is useful in reducing the incidence of post-EVAR type-II persisting endoleaks.
腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的血管腔内修复术(EVAR)是AAA传统手术的既定替代方案,前提是动脉瘤囊、颈部和流出道具有最佳的解剖形态。在大多数已记录的EVAR系列中,II型内漏的发生是一个普遍存在的手术缺陷。这被称为EVAR的致命弱点。这项主要针对非动脉瘤性主动脉解剖结构的形态学研究揭示了肾动脉开口的不同步起源、肠系膜上动脉和骶中动脉的异位、肾下腹主动脉长度的变化、多条肾主干动脉以及副肾动脉的存在(在13%的尸体中)。这种潜在的血管异常在EVAR术前需要仔细考虑。在一项对163例患者进行的为期60个月的EVAR前瞻性临床研究中,使用了四种不同的主动脉支架装置,我们证明在排除之前,术中II型内漏率为3%(5/163)。大多数与腰动脉通畅有关。采用术中积极测量动脉瘤囊压力和血管造影的策略来显示I型和II型内漏,重点关注主动脉侧支的应用解剖结构和变异。术中选择性使用弹簧圈栓塞和向瘤腔内注射凝血酶来栓塞持续存在且易导致逆行渗漏的粗大腰动脉。通过在EVAR期间处理变异的主动脉形态和通畅的腰动脉,我们采用这种积极的治疗策略记录到持续存在的II型内漏发生率较低。观察到1例与动脉瘤相关的死亡(0.6%),原因是EVAR术后晚期破裂,1例术中死亡与不可预测的动脉瘤破裂有关。总之,如果要在EVAR后获得满意且可预测的结果,尤其是在II型内漏的预防、诊断和治疗方面,对腹主动脉及其主要侧支的全面解剖知识,包括变异情况,是一个基本前提。术中对动脉瘤囊压力进行监测、弹簧圈栓塞以及对选定患者在动脉瘤囊内注射凝血酶,有助于降低EVAR术后II型持续内漏的发生率。